All MPL license blocks at the beginning of files must list an "Original Developer." I didn't know this, and I started the bad trend of not including it in files. http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1-annotated.html Section 2 is the relevant section. This could easily be done by parsing out dates and names from checkin comments, if somebody feels adventurous and wants to do that.

Those have no license at all: editmilestones.cgi t/Support/Systemexec.pm skins/standard/show_multiple.css skins/standard/params.css skins/standard/panel.css Those have a BSD license: js/yui/calendar.js js/yui/yahoo-dom-event.js skins/standard/yui/calendar.css This one is in contrib/ so I have no idea if it needs one or not: contrib/sendbugmail.pl Those have none as well, but are also in contrib/ so I have the same question as above: skins/contrib/Dusk/*.css Franck?

> Those have none as well, but are also in contrib/ so I have the same question > as above: > skins/contrib/Dusk/*.css The original ones here have a license (there is only one, global.css). The others aren't part of the distribution because they're being generated by checksetup.pl.

YUI files have the Yahoo license, not a BSD license. They should not be changed, as we do not own them. The Yahoo license is compatible with the MPL, so there's nothing wrong there.

(In reply to comment #4) > YUI files have the Yahoo license, not a BSD license. They should not be > changed, as we do not own them. The Yahoo license is compatible with the MPL, > so there's nothing wrong there. > I can read: Copyright (c) 2007, Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Code licensed under the BSD License: http://developer.yahoo.net/yui/license.txt version: 2.3.1

Ahh, I guess you're right. I thought I read something about them having their own license, but I guess not! :-)

(In reply to comment #5) > Code licensed under the BSD License: Is BSD a problem or not? I know nothing about license issues (nor what you can do and cannot do with them), that's why I'm asking. :)

BSD is not a problem.

(In reply to comment #0) > All MPL license blocks at the beginning of files must list an "Original > Developer." I didn't know this, and I started the bad trend of not including it > in files. > http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1-annotated.html > Section 2 is the relevant section. > This could easily be done by parsing out dates and names from checkin > comments, if somebody feels adventurous and wants to do that. Hello Max, I feel adventurous enough but would need to know where the text is, which would need to be inserted. I'd need also a copy of a correct license to compare to the incorrect ones, etc. I can do this, just need this input / data to do it. Mike

Here's my comment from the dup bug: There are some files in Bugzilla that are entirely missing an MPL license header. If you know the original authors of these files, please CC them on this bug. They must either grant the license here in writing or add the header to the files themselves (and so must anybody else who has ever touched the file). A good example file with a correct format for this header is here: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/webtools/bugzilla/Bugzilla/JobQueue.pm Of course, please replace "Mozilla Corporation" with the name of yourself (if you wrote this on your own time) or the name of your company (if you wrote this on company time--and make sure that your legal department actually does grant this license). The files with missing headers are: contrib/bugzilla_ldapsync.rb contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit contrib/cmdline/* contrib/gnatsparse/* contrib/yp_nomail.sh extensions/example/template/en/global/user-error-errors.html.tmpl skins/standard/panel.css skins/standard/params.css skins/standard/show_bug.css skins/standard/show_multiple.css There are more files that are missing the Initial Developer block, which must be added by the original developer (please CC them if you know who they are) or the grant must be noted here in this bug in writing so that somebody else can write the patch: Bugzilla/Attachment/PatchReader.pm Bugzilla/Auth/Login/Cookie.pm Bugzilla/Auth/Verify/Stack.pm Bugzilla/Auth/Verify.pm Bugzilla/Auth/Login.pm Bugzilla/Install/Filesystem.pm Bugzilla/Install/DB.pm Bugzilla/Install/Requirements.pm Bugzilla/Install/Requirements.pm.orig Bugzilla/Search/Quicksearch.pm Bugzilla/User/Setting/Skin.pm Bugzilla/User/Setting.pm Bugzilla/WebService/Bugzilla.pm Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm Bugzilla/WebService/Constants.pm Bugzilla/WebService/User.pm Bugzilla/WebService/Product.pm Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm.orig Bugzilla/Component.pm Bugzilla/Classification.pm Bugzilla/Product.pm Bugzilla/Field.pm Bugzilla/Install.pm Bugzilla/Keyword.pm Bugzilla/Milestone.pm Bugzilla/Update.pm Bugzilla/Version.pm Bugzilla/WebService.pm contrib/bz_webservice_demo.pl contrib/sendbugmail.pl editfields.cgi editsettings.cgi editusers.cgi editvalues.cgi mod_perl.pl search_plugin.cgi sidebar.cgi skins/standard/create_attachment.css skins/standard/editusers.css skins/standard/index.css skins/standard/panel.css skins/standard/params.css skins/standard/show_bug.css skins/standard/show_multiple.css skins/standard/summarize-time.css skins/standard/voting.css skins/standard/IE-fixes.css summarize_time.cgi t/Support/Systemexec.pm t/010dependencies.t t/011pod.t template/en/default/account/email/confirm-new.html.tmpl template/en/default/account/email/request-new.txt.tmpl template/en/default/account/prefs/settings.html.tmpl template/en/default/welcome-admin.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/custom_fields/create.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/custom_fields/edit.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/custom_fields/list.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/custom_fields/confirm-delete.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/fieldvalues/confirm-delete.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/fieldvalues/create.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/fieldvalues/edit.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/fieldvalues/footer.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/fieldvalues/list.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/fieldvalues/select-field.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/products/groupcontrol/updated.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/products/confirm-delete.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/products/create.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/products/edit-common.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/products/edit.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/products/footer.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/products/list-classifications.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/products/list.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/settings/edit.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/users/confirm-delete.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/users/create.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/users/edit.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/users/list.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/users/listselectvars.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/users/search.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/users/userdata.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/users/responsibilities.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/admin.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/workflow/comment.html.tmpl template/en/default/admin/workflow/edit.html.tmpl template/en/default/attachment/confirm-delete.html.tmpl template/en/default/attachment/delete_reason.txt.tmpl template/en/default/bug/summarize-time.html.tmpl template/en/default/global/per-bug-queries.html.tmpl template/en/default/global/setting-descs.none.tmpl template/en/default/global/textarea.html.tmpl template/en/default/global/userselect.html.tmpl template/en/default/pages/quicksearch.html.tmpl template/en/default/pages/quicksearchhack.html.tmpl template/en/default/reports/old-charts.html.tmpl template/en/default/reports/report-simple.html.tmpl template/en/default/search/search-plugin.xml.tmpl testagent.cgi testserver.pl userprefs.cgi xmlrpc.cgi

And here's mine, most of which is also applicable to this bug: > If you know the original authors of these files, please CC them on this > bug. They must either grant the license here in writing or add the header to > the files themselves (and so must anybody else who has ever touched the file). That's just simply not true. These files are MPLed just like the rest of Bugzilla, and I don't think you'd find a court that said otherwise. After all, under what terms have we been distributing them and everyone been using them for the years they've existed, if not those terms? There are hundreds, possibly thousands of files in the Mozilla source tree without license headers, and it's not a cause of stress for anyone. If you would like to add license headers to all the files you list above, feel free. That would be a great thing to do (and it requires a little research to fill in the headers properly). But please don't imply that there's a licensing problem until we do this, because there isn't. However, please do not copy licenses from existing files. The license pages on www.mozilla.org say specifically not to do that. Instead, please use the boilerplate headers here: http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/boilerplate-1.1/ Perhaps emailing licensing@mozilla.org might have been a good first step in looking into this question? :-) Gerv

(In reply to comment #12) > That's just simply not true. These files are MPLed just like the rest of > Bugzilla, and I don't think you'd find a court that said otherwise. After all, > under what terms have we been distributing them and everyone been using them > for the years they've existed, if not those terms? [snip] Ah, that's great to know! :-) That makes things much simpler. > Please don't imply that there's a licensing problem > until we do this, because there isn't. Well, the Committer's Agreement that I just signed says that I have to be in compliance with the license for code I've committed, and the license seems to require that I put that block at the top of each file. I assume other committers are bound similarly. It's good to know that there is no legal problem with this, though, that's relieving. :-) > However, please do not copy licenses from existing files. The license pages on > www.mozilla.org say specifically not to do that. Instead, please use the > boilerplate headers here: > http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/boilerplate-1.1/ Thanks. :-) For Bugzilla, usually the most appropriate one would be this one (since we don't use the tri-license): http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/boilerplate-1.1/mpl-sh

(In reply to comment #13) > Well, the Committer's Agreement that I just signed says that I have to be in > compliance with the license for code I've committed, and the license seems to > require that I put that block at the top of each file. I assume other > committers are bound similarly. They are; but if files magically appear all on their own without the headers, it's not a big deal. ;-) > Thanks. :-) For Bugzilla, usually the most appropriate one would be this one > (since we don't use the tri-license): > > http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/boilerplate-1.1/mpl-sh Right. :-) Gerv

Fixed when switching to MPL 2.0.