Closed Bug 372483 Opened 18 years ago Closed 18 years ago

"ASSERTION: expected a frame" with <math:munder>

Categories

(Core :: MathML, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: MatsPalmgren_bugz)

References

Details

(Keywords: assertion, regression, testcase)

Attachments

(3 files)

A <math:munder> by itself triggers:

###!!! ASSERTION: expected a frame: 'aFirst', file /Users/jruderman/trunk/mozilla/layout/mathml/base/src/nsMathMLContainerFrame.cpp, line 1420

I think this is a recent regression.
Attached file testcase (deleted) —
mea culpa
Assignee: rbs → mats.palmgren
Blocks: 366012
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: PC → All
Attached file stack (deleted) —
Attached patch Patch rev. 1 (deleted) — Splinter Review
There are a couple of call sites where aFirst could be null, we could
add null checks at those places but I think making DidReflowChildren()
deal with a null frame is less error prone.
Attachment #257222 - Flags: superreview?(rbs)
Attachment #257222 - Flags: review?(rbs)
Comment on attachment 257222 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch rev. 1

Agree. r+sr=rbs
Attachment #257222 - Flags: superreview?(rbs)
Attachment #257222 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #257222 - Flags: review?(rbs)
Attachment #257222 - Flags: review+
Checked in to trunk at 2007-03-04 08:13 PST.

-> FIXED
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Flags: in-testsuite?
Depends on: 368573
Crashtest checked in.
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: