[meta] MathML Element and Attribute fuzzer
Categories
(Core :: Fuzzing, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 11 open bugs)
Details
(Keywords: meta, sec-other, Whiteboard: [sg:nse] meta)
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
(deleted),
application/xhtml+xml
|
Details |
Reporter | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
Do we still run MathML fuzzing? I'm asking because of all the MathML re-implementation that's currently happening.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 11•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Frederik Braun [:freddyb] from comment #10)
Do we still run MathML fuzzing? I'm asking because of all the MathML re-implementation that's currently happening.
I think bug 1583037 will be helpful here. Currently when an element does not have the expected number of children, we basically don't perform MathML layout in the subtree but just display an "invalid markup" message. That makes fuzzing and automatic testcase reduction harder.
Comment 12•5 years ago
|
||
Yes, we do. Domino (bug 1340565) is targeting MathML.
Comment 13•3 years ago
|
||
The bug assignee didn't login in Bugzilla in the last 7 months.
:decoder, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Description
•