Closed Bug 40158 Opened 24 years ago Closed 24 years ago

XPToolkit PR2 bugs

Categories

(Core :: XUL, defect, P3)

Product:
Core
Component:
XUL
Platform:
x86
Windows 98
Type:
defect

Tracking

()

Status:
VERIFIED FIXED
Milestone:
Future

People

(Reporter: trudelle, Assigned: trudelle)

References

Details

(Keywords: meta)

Tracker for my team's '+' bugs for PR2
Keywords: meta
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Depends on: 3025, 5195, 12021, 12761, 15555, 21539, 23060, 25684, 28459, 28505, 28594, 29027, 29636, 30379, 31104, 31118, 31233, 31378, 31754, 32155, 33090, 33735, 35045, 35100, 35503, 35553, 35655, 35681, 35726, 35921, 36039, 36361, 36470, 37472, 37655, 37835, 382
Target Milestone: --- → M22
no longer relevant, closing.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
No longer depends on: 29636
Snort. Huh? Yawn. Woke me up (but removing that dependency was a little silly). -> rsverified dead.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Sorry about that, but I'll be a little more silly while I'm at it. No harm, no foul, right? If it's not a real dependency, I don't want to see it. Theoretically, Bugzilla should automate this... Bugs 12761, 28594, 32155, and 35726 no longer block this, as this bug has been resolved. Updating.
Depends on: 29636
No longer depends on: 12761, 28594, 32155, 35726
But (a) closed bugs listed in the 'blocks' field of still extant bugs do _not_ block those extant bugs, (b) you're destroying bugzilla "history", and (c) given point (a), this is just spam that no one needs. I'm not going to add those bugs back (and induce a second flurry of spam), but I'd prefer that this type of housekeeping _not_ be done.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.