Tracking bug for the new Change Status page, where authors can make a number of status changes to their add-on.

I'm looking for feedback on the layouts I just attached. There's a number of new features here and a slight change in the add-on lifecycle process. In the new Developer Tools, uploading an add-on is a one-step process of just uploading the file. Because of that, all new add-ons will be marked as Incomplete when they are uploaded. It's then up to the developer to go through the edit pages and make the appropriate changes, including the required changes to appear anywhere on the site, listed above as Completion Criteria. After they have met the completion criteria they can complete their add-on by moving it to the sandbox. From the sandbox, if they meet the public nomination criteria, they can then nominate their add-on to become public. We now show the number of other add-ons nominated after an add-on has been nominated. One problem area is the reviews requirement. Since we allow external reviews, I didn't know if we should mark that requirement as complete if they have more than 3 or 5 reviews on AMO and mark it as in progress otherwise indicating that if they have external reviews they should be entered in the nomination page.

Justin, I love all the pages. Given what I've seen to date, I think that the reviews are suggested since as you mention external reviews count. So, I would leave it on there but not make it mandatory (perhaps not a check or an X but a statement with a bullet - or something like that). Thanks.

Marking this fixed. The status changer is finished on 3.5 and I'll be merging it and the preview manager into trunk soon for more widespread beta testing with the next AMO push. Any issues found should be filed as new bugs.