Closed
Bug 52416
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Editor does not accept NS_TEXT_EVENT while losing input focus
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Editor, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: masaki.katakai, Assigned: masaki.katakai)
References
Details
(Keywords: fixedOEM, intl)
Attachments
(1 file, 6 obsolete files)
(deleted),
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
UNIX IMEs sometimes invoke extra windows for operation,
for example, candidate window which grabs input focus.
As I described the problem in
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29065
IME wants to draw pre-edit text (composed text) while
the candidate window is invoked.
It seems that Editor does not accept NS_TEXT_EVENT
for updating pre-edit text by the recent changes in
Editor and Layout (/event?). When I filed a bug 29065,
Editor could accept NS_TEXT_EVENT, so I could see
the pre-edit text was updated event when candidate
window is invoked. However, it does not work on the
current build.
How to reproduce:
1) Start Mozilla
2) Visit www.yahoo.com
3) Click on text field for Search
4) Turn conversion on by Shift+SPACE
5) Type a i
6) Invoke candidate window by SPACE, SPACE
Main window of Mozilla will loose the input focus
7) Select a candidate
candidate window will be closed and the selected text
will be drawn on the text field, but it won't.
The first candidate word is still displayed.
8) type return to commit the word
The correct word is committed, which means the word
drawn in 7) is not correct.
I'd like to ask Editor and Layout folks to evalute this problem.
Problem of kinput2 (filed as 47568) seems to happen due to this.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
reassign to kin. add yokoyama@netscape.com to the cc list
kin- do you know what happen about this ?
Assignee: beppe → kin
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
setting to m19, Kin please take a look and see what is up, we will evaluate
after Kin has preformed a preliminary debug
Whiteboard: [need info]
Target Milestone: --- → M19
Accepting bug.
I'm going to need some help setting IME up on my Linux box.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
Kin - Is somebody helping to setup IME on your Linux?
Also, since this is i18n related problem, I suggest to assign
teruko@netscape.com or ji@netscape.com for QA concact.
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
Adding intl and nsbeta1 keywords.
Adding mcarlson to cc-list.
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
I see slightly different behavior.
export LANG=ja_JP.eucJP
jserver
kinput2 &
./mozilla
1) click in the URL bar.
2) shift-space to engage IME
3) type "watashi"
4) type Ctrl-w twice to bring up candidate window
If I use the keyboard to navigate the candidate window
(space to advance, return to select) the new character(s)
is displayed.
If I use the mouse to select a candidate the new character(s)
is not displayed until I click in the URL bar.
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
Katakai-san, is your window focus model: pointer or click?
Would someone at sun check if the display is wrong when:
1) just using the keyboard to select the kanji
or
2) using the pointer to select the kanji
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
tajima@eng.sun.com is blocked by this bug. Any ideas on unblocking?
/be
Summary: Editor does not accept NS_TEXT_EVENT while loosing input focus → Editor does not accept NS_TEXT_EVENT while losing input focus
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 74823 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 74825 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
changing to nsbeta1-. this one does not meet beta stopper guidelines.
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
Beppe - I don't we should future this one, it has multiple dupes and is a
blocker. Pls reconsider for M0.9.2.
Adding nsCatFood and RTM keyword.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
This problem is still serious when users use enlightenment and
CDE window manager because there is no way to configure IME
candidate window not to grab input focus.
The problem is that event with NS_TEXT_EVENT does not
go to the *last focused* content. I'm now debugging
this problem and need you help. It seems that IME works
well on HTML editor but does not work on any input
field of XUL docs and HTML form. I found the following
mCurrentEventContent = mDocument->GetRootContent();
in
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/layout/html/base/src/nsPresShell.cpp#5399
does not return correct content while it's losing
input focus. On HTML editor, it returns correct
value which is same wiht HTML editor itself.
However, on HTML form, the GetRootContent() returns
the parent(?) content of HTML form field, not
the exact content of HTML form field.
Is there any way to get the *last focused* content
(e.g. input form) here? Or if it is OK to return
the parent content here but can we pass the event
to the input form finally?
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
This sounds like this is a Focus/Event problem, not an editor problem.
Cc'ing the focus gurus ... saari@netscape.com and blizzard@mozilla.org
Anyone want to take this off my plate?
Comment 16•23 years ago
|
||
Editor *will* get a blur event if the window is deactivated. Can the editor
accept these events when blurred? Have you verified that it gets them, or does
the event never make it that far?
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•23 years ago
|
||
I understand editor can accept NS_TEXT_EVENT events while losing focus
because this problem does not happen on HTMLEditor (Composer). This problem
happens on any text field of GUI and HTML forms.
When input field has an input focus,
manager->GetFocusedContent(&mCurrentEventContent);
can return the correct and exact content of nsHTMLInputElement. If not,
mCurrentEventContent = mDocument->GetRootContent();
can not return the exact content of the *last focused* nsHTMLInputElement.
Is it possible to get the *last focused* content here?
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•23 years ago
|
||
I've verified this problem does not happen on M16 but M17 has this problem.
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•23 years ago
|
||
Should we change Summary to "layout does not throw NS_TEXT_EVENT event
to nsHTMLInputElement while losing focus" ?
Comment 20•23 years ago
|
||
I found one questionable point on source codes.
(But, I don't know this is related to this bug.)
Try to search by NS_TEXT_EVENT.
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/search?string=NS_TEXT_EVENT
There are many codes like "event->message == NS_TEXT_EVENT".
However, according to the struct nsEvent,
NS_TEXT_EVENT must be in member "eventStructType", not "message".
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/widget/public/nsGUIEvent.h#88
Are these codes mistakes?
Comment 21•23 years ago
|
||
Did anyone see my comment above ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•23 years ago
|
||
Thank you, Kamio-san,
widget side always sets both message and
eventStructType to NS_TEXT_EVENT. So I don't
think this causes problem.
/widget/src/gtk/nsWindow.cpp, line 3700 -- textEvent.message =
textEvent.eventStructType = NS_TEXT_EVENT;
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•23 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•23 years ago
|
||
I've attached the codes for workaround.
The problem is that if losing input focus, editor
does not accept any NS_TEXT_EVENT so we're seeing
two problems,
- composed characters are not updated when
we choose a candidate on candidate window.
when the candidate window grabs input focus.
- commit string on candidate window does not
work because commit event comes before mozilla
grabs input focus again from candidate window
There is no way to solve problem #1 by IME side,
but for problem #2, we can store committed string
as pending string then commit it by the input
focus is back. I understand this is not really
good way to solive this, but it can be workaround
for reference. #2 is very serious issue.
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•23 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•23 years ago
|
||
patch for widget side is not working well on composer,
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=76393&action=view
because focus is not back to "html editor pane" when
getting focus again... Actually there is not way
for widget side to fix this problem...
I tried to modify PresShell::HandleEvent() of nsPresShell.cpp.
manager->GetFocusedContent(&mCurrentEventContent);
Is the focus in Mozilla, mCurrentEventContent
is returned. This is correct.
If not, trying to get mCurrentEventContent by,
mDocument->GetRootContent(&mCurrentEventContent);
this works on only composer. On HTML form and
any XUL UI, it does not work. When input focus
is not on Mozilla, this code is used but
which will not send NS_TEXT_EVENT to proper
contents.
How about the patch? If the input focus
exactly is not on Mozilla, get the last
focused-content by using GetFocusedElement().
If not, continue to use mDocument->GetRootContent().
Kin, what do you think? logically correct?
Toshi, can you try on your environment?
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•23 years ago
|
||
so, this is not editor bug, I think.
Is it better to change component to layout or event handling?
Comment 28•23 years ago
|
||
Right, the bug is not an editor or layout problem, it's an event
handling/dispatching problem.
I'm going to defer to the focus/event handling gurus on this one, since I don't
know the full extent of what could be affeted by your patches.
saari, aaronl, or joki ... any comments?
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•23 years ago
|
||
Could anyone review the patch and give comments please?
Comment 30•23 years ago
|
||
Since we know this isn't an editor problem, I'm going to hand this one over to
saari so it shows up on his radar.
Assignee: kin → saari
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Comment 31•23 years ago
|
||
saari@netscape.com: Can you or someone take a look of this patch for us
please? We want someone in this area to check out the patch because we need
this ASAP for Sun's release. Thanks, Margaret
Comment 32•23 years ago
|
||
Chris Saari is on vacation until Tuesday.
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•22 years ago
|
||
Can anyone review the patch?
I've verified the patch is working fine with the
current tree.
Comment 34•22 years ago
|
||
We need this review please. Can someone give us a pointer to a reviewer for
this bug?
Comment 36•22 years ago
|
||
Hi Roland. Thanks for cc'ing to others. Any chance that you can help getting
this in? We need it badly. Margaret
Comment 37•22 years ago
|
||
I am concerned with the last change; it sounds like that will break something on
Macintosh (maybe keybindings?).
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•22 years ago
|
||
Thank you very much for comment,
I don't have build environment for Mac, so I can not verify this.
OK, this problem happens on only UNIX platform, no problem for
other platoform because candidate window does not grabs input
focus on other platform. We'd better to keep existing codes
for other platform. I've added #if defined(XP_UNIX) for safety.
Also, for safer way and to avoid performance regression for
normal key event, I've put the codes for getting
mCurrentEventContent into
if (NS_IS_IME_EVENT(aEvent)) {
}
Could you review again please?
Attachment #76393 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #77207 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 39•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 97720 [details] [diff] [review]
use defined(XP_UNIX)
I am not sure whether |XP_UNIX| is correct since we have Unix-like OSes without
X11 (MacOSX, Photon port, BeOS etc. etc) ...
... what about using |MOZ_X11| instead ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 40•22 years ago
|
||
Thanks, Roland.
Yes, I believe that MOZ_X11 is correct for this case.
Comment 41•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #97720 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 42•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 97757 [details] [diff] [review]
Updated patch which is only used on X11-based ports (GTK+, Qt, Xlib)
I'm not at all familiar with this code, but it looks very safe -- it won't
effect non-X11 platforms and it won't change anything on any event that isn't
NS_IS_IME_EVENT, so I think taking it is safe. I have three stylistic issues:
>+ nsCOMPtr<nsIFocusController> focusController;
>+ nsCOMPtr<nsIScriptGlobalObject> ourGlobal;
>+ mDocument->GetScriptGlobalObject(getter_AddRefs(ourGlobal));
>+ nsCOMPtr<nsPIDOMWindow> ourWindow = do_QueryInterface(ourGlobal);
>+ if (ourWindow) {
>+ ourWindow->GetRootFocusController(getter_AddRefs(focusController));
You don't really need the focus controller until you're inside the ourWindow
clause, so it would be better to declare it there.
>+ if(focusedElement) {
You should probably put a space after the if for consistency with the rest of
the function.
The third issue is that I find it hard to read with the X11 clause in one place
and then later the !X11 clause. Everything in between them is comments, and
they all apply to the non-X11 clause, so can you change that first #endif to an
#else and remove the #ifndef? I'll attach a revision of the patch in case that
wasn't clear, with my three changes, but I'll mark my r=akkana on this one.
Attachment #97757 -
Flags: review+
Comment 43•22 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 44•22 years ago
|
||
Thank you very much, Akkana.
I've corrected the position of focusController definition and
space issue. Your changes for #else are included.
Could you r= please?
Assignee | ||
Comment 45•22 years ago
|
||
Oh, I'm sorry the patch has r= already.
Now asking sr=... to reviewers.
Assignee: saari → katakai
Comment 46•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 97919 [details] [diff] [review]
new patch with Akkana 's comment
+ // if not, search pre-focused element
"search for"
+#endif /* !MOZ_X11 */
That '!' should not be there (since your ifdef is now just MOZ_X11).
+ focusedElement->QueryInterface(NS_GET_IID(nsIContent),
+ (void
**)&mCurrentEventContent);
CallQueryInterface(focusedElement, &mCurrentEventContent);
Also, there's lots of commented-out code around here that just makes the code
hard to understand, imo. Could we just remove that code please? (cced saari,
who commented this out ages ago).
Looks good other than those nits.
Assignee | ||
Comment 47•22 years ago
|
||
Thank you very much for review and comments, Boris.
I've corrected the patch, except removing codes in comment line.
Saari, could you give suggestion asap?
We're very close to code freeze of OEM branch.
Attachment #97757 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #97876 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #97919 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 48•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 98409 [details] [diff] [review]
update patch
sr=bzbarsky. Just land this if saari does not get back to you by the time you
need to land it... If possible, do that on branch only so we can clean the code
up a bit on the trunk.
Attachment #98409 -
Attachment description: update patch → update patch
Attachment #98409 -
Flags: superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 49•22 years ago
|
||
Sure,
Thank you very much.
Trunk tree is frozen for Mozilla 1.2alpha, so I'll not
ask this to Trunk but ask to OEMbrach. Adding branchOEM
keyword to request checkin to OEMbranch.
Whiteboard: [need info] → branchOEM
Comment 50•22 years ago
|
||
Hi Masaki:
Please check this in to the OEM branch. Jim has already given you the
permission for checkin to the OEM branch under the assumption that you will
check this into the trunk when the code is cleaned up and the trunk is reopen.
Thanks, Margaret
Comment 51•22 years ago
|
||
Hi Boris: Is saari around? We have not heard from him for quite a while.
Shall we check in to the trunk (once it is open) and file another bug (assigned
to saari) for code clean up. We just want to make sure that we are in sync with
the trunk to avoid any discrepancies with our future release. Thanks, Margaret
Comment 52•22 years ago
|
||
If saari is not answering, I say we rip out those comments (and make that clear
in the checkin comment). CVS history will have them if really needed.
Comment 53•22 years ago
|
||
> If saari is not answering, I say we rip out those comments (and make that clear
> in the checkin comment). CVS history will have them if really needed.
I concur with Boris, in case you want a second opinion/reviewer for that part.
Assignee | ||
Comment 54•22 years ago
|
||
Tree is now open for 1.2Beta.
I'll check in the same patch to Trunk and OEMbranch.
For Trunk, after the check-in, I'll remove the
commented out codes with proper CVS comments by
myself for clean up if I do not get answer from
Sarri or ask Sarri to do that.
Assignee | ||
Comment 55•22 years ago
|
||
checked in the patch to Trunk.
Will track code cleanup as bug 167866.
Thanks everyone for your help!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 56•22 years ago
|
||
checked into OEM branch.
Thanks again.
Whiteboard: branchOEM → fixedOEM
Comment 57•22 years ago
|
||
Seems it still not fix for me on 09-12 trunk and 09-13 branch builds / linux
RH7.2-JA.
So, this fix only for OEM? I wonder why?
Comment 58•22 years ago
|
||
It was checked in to the trunk. Not branch
though. I am assuming that you are talking about the 1.2 alpha branch?
Comment 59•22 years ago
|
||
No, I double checked this on 09-13 both trunk and branch - I don't see there is
any difference:
If I invoke Japanese IME, and start type something to bring up the candidate
window, and press space key to switch the candidate chracters, only first two
characters can be displayed in non-commit character position, all others can be
highlighted but can not showed up in non-commit character. When I hit return
key to commit, then I will get the highlighted character(s) be commit not the
one in non-commit position.
Is this bug supposedly fix this problem?
Assignee | ||
Comment 60•22 years ago
|
||
Hi Yuying, thank you for testing,
The first problem - only first candidate can be displayed on preedit area
this is correct behavior of kinput2. Please try the same operation on
normal gtk application such as gedit. You can see the same behavior on it.
The 2nd problem - candidate string can not be displayed at commit
this is a bug of kinput2 I understand. Please see bug 63456.
I have marked the bug as WONT FIX.
kinput2 does not call needed method at commit. Type something
after your commit, the preedit string can be changed to proper
characters you selected at candidate window.
Does your testing team have ATOK X input server? I'll try to
verify the fix on Trun with ATOK X and let you know the result.
Assignee | ||
Comment 61•22 years ago
|
||
verified the fix on OEM branch and Trunk on both
Linux and Solaris.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•