Closed
Bug 528008
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Reply All add email addresses in the reply one address per line. Not manageable
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Message Compose Window, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 440377
People
(Reporter: mad.engineer, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: dupeme?)
Attachments
(2 files)
Screen shot showing the issue
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Thunderbird/3.0b4
Please see the attached screen shot for details to better understand the issue.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See attached screen shot
2.
3.
Actual Results:
Please see the attached screen shot for details to better understand the issue.
Please see the attached screen shot for details to better understand the issue.
|
Reporter | |
Updated•15 years ago
|
Version: unspecified → 3.0
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
I'm not an Outlook fan, but I'd admit that this part is done extremely right in Outlook which Thunderbird lack very poorly. Outlook when doing a Reply All with a large Cc: list in the original email will neatly make all the Cc: addresses in one field/line semi-colon separated which is not only manageable but also saves real estate space in the message reply window. Thunderbird is very ugly in this specific area IMHO.
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
|
||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Validating RFE , as being unique in the db.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Version: 3.0 → Trunk
This appears to be a special case of bug 440377, duping?
Whiteboard: dupeme?
|
||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
I agree to comment #5: it seems closely dupe of bug #440377.
Feel free to reopen it if I'm wrong.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•