Closed Bug 564606 Opened 15 years ago Closed 15 years ago

[SeaMonkey, non-nightly] Fix "Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: ..."

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)

defect
Not set
minor

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED
seamonkey2.1a2

People

(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: sgautherie)

References

Details

Attachments

(4 files)

{ WINNT 5.2 comm-central-trunk build on 2010/05/08 06:05:07 Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/layers.dll (package-manifest, 58). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/components/caps.dll (package-manifest, 67). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/components/intlapp.dll (package-manifest, 83). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/components/mozfind.dll (package-manifest, 86). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/components/xpc3250.dll (package-manifest, 105). + WINNT 5.2 comm-central-trunk leak test build on 2010/05/08 04:59:40 Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/Microsoft.VC80.CRT.manifest (package-manifest, 41). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/msvcm80.dll (package-manifest, 42). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/msvcp80.dll (package-manifest, 43). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/msvcr80.dll (package-manifest, 44). }
Flags: in-testsuite-
Depends on: 560147
Depends on: 555658
Attachment #444258 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #444261 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Depends on: 560199
Attachment #444262 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #444258 - Flags: approval-seamonkey2.1a1?
Attachment #444261 - Flags: approval-seamonkey2.1a1?
Attachment #444262 - Flags: approval-seamonkey2.1a1?
(In reply to comment #0) > { > WINNT 5.2 comm-central-trunk leak test build on 2010/05/08 04:59:40 > Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: > bin/Microsoft.VC80.CRT.manifest (package-manifest, 41). > Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/msvcm80.dll > (package-manifest, 42). > Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/msvcp80.dll > (package-manifest, 43). > Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/msvcr80.dll > (package-manifest, 44). > } http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox/1273330387.1273336886.16604.gz&fulltext=1 WINNT 5.2 mozilla-central leak test build on 2010/05/08 07:53:07 { environment: WIN32_REDIST_DIR=d:/msvs8/VC/redist/x86/Microsoft.VC80.CRT } cn-sea-qm-win2k3-01 (and maybe other builders) are missing WIN32_REDIST_DIR.
(In reply to comment #4) > cn-sea-qm-win2k3-01 (and maybe other builders) are missing WIN32_REDIST_DIR. If so, then all are missing it, I don't think we're setting it locally, it pretty surely is in the buildbot configs. I've not been very much around in the last days due to being somewhat ill and on a local conference, could you find out when/where they changed this? If not, I'll dig in myself, but it might take some time until I've worked all my backlogs to that point.
(In reply to comment #5) > I don't think we're setting it locally I was guessing our boxes should, but I've no real clue either way: you may want to ask m-c RelEng... > it pretty surely is in the buildbot configs. All I found is http://mxr.mozilla.org/build/search?string=WIN32_REDIST_DIR&case=1 which started with bug 518910. (which makes me wonder whether that fennec export would somehow "leak/fix" to firefox.?.) > could you find out when/where they changed this? I'm not sure where to search further :-/ For example, WINNT 5.2 comm-central-trunk leak test build on 2010/04/10 12:41:05 already had this bug.
Depends on: 564654
(In reply to comment #0) > Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/layers.dll > (package-manifest, 58). http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=SeaMonkey/1273330387.1273335053.9918.gz&fulltext=1 WINNT 5.2 comm-central-trunk build on 2010/05/08 07:53:07 s: cb-seamonkey-win32-02 doesn't report this one. I assume a clobber will be wanted after my 3 patches are in...
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=SeaMonkey/1273367846.1273370115.1970.gz&fulltext=1 OS X 10.5 comm-central-trunk build on 2010/05/08 18:17:26 http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=SeaMonkey/1273367846.1273368939.30689.gz&fulltext=1 OS X 10.5 comm-central-trunk leak test build on 2010/05/08 18:17:26 { Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: SeaMonkey.app/Contents/MacOS/libgfxpsshar.dylib (package-manifest, 57). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: SeaMonkey.app/Contents/MacOS/libgtkxtbin.dylib (package-manifest, 58). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: SeaMonkey.app/Contents/MacOS/components/libaccessibility.dylib (package-manifest, 67). Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: SeaMonkey.app/Contents/MacOS/components/libfileview.dylib (package-manifest, 79). }
Linux: same 5 files as Windows.
OS: Windows Server 2003 → All
Hardware: x86 → All
serge, do you consider this a 2.1a1 blocker, or is it a relatively minor thing that can wait a bit longer. If its a blocker I'll get it tomorrow after work; otherwise I'll get it when I wake up on Monday.
(In reply to comment #10) > do you consider this a 2.1a1 blocker This bug is not a blocker, as it doesn't affect static builds.
FYI, layers.dll isn't built any more, it's been merged/linked into thebes.dll due to (our!) build problems with it.
Attachment #444258 - Flags: review?(kairo)
Attachment #444261 - Flags: review?(kairo)
Attachment #444262 - Flags: review?(kairo)
Attachment #444258 - Flags: approval-seamonkey2.1a1?
Attachment #444261 - Flags: approval-seamonkey2.1a1?
Attachment #444262 - Flags: approval-seamonkey2.1a1?
Blocks: 521523
Blocks: 534664
Damn! I already have a (correct but refused) patch in bug 534664 for these 4 MacOSX warnings. Then I'll only workaround/fix the 3 obvious cases here :-|
Attachment #444528 - Flags: review?(kairo)
Attachment #444528 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Whiteboard: [ToDo: KaiRo, comment 6]
Attachment #444258 - Flags: review?(kairo)
Attachment #444258 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #444258 - Flags: review+
Attachment #444261 - Flags: review?(kairo)
Attachment #444261 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #444261 - Flags: review+
Attachment #444262 - Flags: review?(kairo)
Attachment #444262 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Attachment #444262 - Flags: review+
Comment on attachment 444528 [details] [diff] [review] (Dv1) Fix bug 521523 mistake, Make bug 495612 more specific [Checkin: See comment 21] I'm not going to step on Roberts toes from his r- on that other bug, please get his review here.
Attachment #444528 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Comment on attachment 444528 [details] [diff] [review] (Dv1) Fix bug 521523 mistake, Make bug 495612 more specific [Checkin: See comment 21] >-components/@DLL_PREFIX@fileview@DLL_SUFFIX@ >+ #ifdef UNIX_BUT_NOT_MAC >+ components/@DLL_PREFIX@fileview@DLL_SUFFIX@ >+ #endif Where do those strange indentation changes come from?
Attachment #444258 - Attachment description: (Av1) Port 560147 → (Av1) Port 560147 [Checkin: Comment 16]
Attachment #444261 - Attachment description: (Bv1) Port 555658 → (Bv1) Port 555658 [Checkin: Comment 17]
Attachment #444262 - Attachment description: (Cv1) Port 560199 → (Cv1) Port 560199 [Checkin: Comment 18]
Attachment #444258 - Attachment description: (Av1) Port 560147 [Checkin: Comment 16] → (Av1) Port bug 560147 [Checkin: Comment 16]
Attachment #444261 - Attachment description: (Bv1) Port 555658 [Checkin: Comment 17] → (Bv1) Port bug 555658 [Checkin: Comment 17]
Attachment #444262 - Attachment description: (Cv1) Port 560199 [Checkin: Comment 18] → (Cv1) Port bug 560199 [Checkin: Comment 18]
(In reply to comment #15) > Where do those strange indentation changes come from? Bug 555512 > bug 541824...
Blocks: 541824
Comment on attachment 444528 [details] [diff] [review] (Dv1) Fix bug 521523 mistake, Make bug 495612 more specific [Checkin: See comment 21] r=me on the precondition that you don't change indentation in removed-files inmconsistently. The same comment as for bug 545631 comment #4 also counts here.
Attachment #444528 - Flags: review?(kairo) → review+
Attachment #444528 - Attachment description: (Dv1) Fix bug 521523 mistake, Make bug 495612 more specific → (Dv1) Fix bug 521523 mistake, Make bug 495612 more specific [Checkin: Comment 21]
Attachment #444528 - Attachment description: (Dv1) Fix bug 521523 mistake, Make bug 495612 more specific [Checkin: Comment 21] → (Dv1) Fix bug 521523 mistake, Make bug 495612 more specific [Checkin: See comment 21]
Comment on attachment 444528 [details] [diff] [review] (Dv1) Fix bug 521523 mistake, Make bug 495612 more specific [Checkin: See comment 21] (In reply to comment #21) > http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/763516635645 Dv1, with comment 20 suggestion(s).
Depends on: 565774
(In reply to comment #0) > { > WINNT 5.2 comm-central-trunk leak test build on 2010/05/08 04:59:40 > Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: > bin/Microsoft.VC80.CRT.manifest (package-manifest, 41). > Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/msvcm80.dll > (package-manifest, 42). > Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/msvcp80.dll > (package-manifest, 43). > Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/msvcr80.dll > (package-manifest, 44). > } I filed bug 565774.
No longer blocks: 541824
Severity: normal → minor
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [ToDo: KaiRo, comment 6]
Target Milestone: --- → seamonkey2.1a2
Depends on: 585462
Depends on: 586822
Depends on: 586854
Depends on: 515374
No longer depends on: 564654
Blocks: 713134
No longer depends on: 515374
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: