Closed Bug 584891 Opened 14 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Need to verify that the runtestsUtils conf95 function is accurate for small numbers

Categories

(Tamarin Graveyard :: Tools, defect, P3)

Product:
Tamarin Graveyard
Component:
Tools
Type:
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
VERIFIED INVALID
Milestone:
Q4 11 - Anza

People

(Reporter: cpeyer, Assigned: cpeyer)

References

Details

When running the performance runtests in index mode, results can be very small numbers (sometimes 1 and below). The conf95 function in runtestUtils will return a > 100% conf interval for small numbers. I'm not sure that this is correct. e.g: > conf95([1.01, .96, .98]) > 119.01475586404142 For larger values, the interval seems correct > conf95([101, 96, 98]) > 5.1877329360152133
Assignee: nobody → cpeyer
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: flashplayer-triage+
Flags: flashplayer-qrb+
Priority: -- → P3
Target Milestone: --- → flash10.2
Blocks: 607714
Target Milestone: Q3 11 - Serrano → Q4 11 - Anza
Upon looking at the code, the formula is correct. Marking invalid.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.