(Thunderbird) Crash in [@ EMPTY: no crashing thread identified; ERROR_NO_MINIDUMP_HEADER ]. Mostly OOM. Often from operating on thousands of messages.
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: wsmwk, Unassigned, NeedInfo)
References
(Depends on 4 open bugs, )
Details
(Keywords: crash, topcrash-thunderbird, Whiteboard: [bulkoperations])
Crash Data
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
A less frequent crash sig, @ EMPTY: no crashing thread identified; ERROR_NO_THREAD_LIST
Reporter | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment 10•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #8)
For current thunderbird versions this ranks in the 35-50 range, so no longer
topcrash
Where is it at now?
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•4 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•4 years ago
|
||
version 3.0?
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•3 years ago
|
||
Been a long time since I've seen this. bp-1f898f6f-414e-4333-82cd-7dc730210722 91.0b2
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•3 years ago
|
||
Combined signatures ranks this #15 for 78.12.0 => topcrash
(In reply to Worcester12345 from comment #12)
version 3.0?
The bug is still open, which is sufficient to indicate the issue exists in the current version, so no need to change the version (even if it is tempting). And not changing the value of the version preserves the identity of the version first reported.
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #14)
Combined signatures ranks this #15 for 78.12.0 => topcrash
Now combined ranking is top 20 - individually #28 and #47. But no empty signatures in version 91. So the signature has changed.
Perhaps now one of these based on ranking (otherwise pure speculation - I haven't looked at the stacks)? Or maybe collected under oom | small
- #25 91.2.1 OOM | large | mozalloc_abort | moz_xmalloc | mozilla::detail::HashTable<T>::changeTableSize | mozilla::detail::HashTable<T>::add<T> | mozilla::JSHolderMap::Put
- #48 91.2.1 OOM | large | xul.dll | _PR_NativeRunThread | pr_root
- #44 91.2.1 Signature report for OOM | large | mozalloc_abort | moz_xmalloc | XPCConvert::JSData2Native
There are also these "new" EMPTY signatures
Updated•2 years ago
|
Description
•