Need this for Phase 2 of Rapid Release project "document" icon - http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/document.ico "document" icon (PNG) - http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/document.png 300x236 logo+wordmark image - http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/content/about.png Splash screen BMP - http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/splash.bmp Mac icns files http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/disk.icns http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/firefox.icns http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/document.icns OS/2 ICO files http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/document-os2.ico http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/firefox-os2.ico

hi sean. do you need anything else from us here? what's the next step? thanks!

What's the deadline on this again?

I don't think there's any set deadline. Some in-product icons are not quite right because we haven't updated them (bug 649526), but since this only applies to aurora/nightly, it's hardly a critical issue.

adding a few more things to this bug: we need to update the Aurora wordmark in the product. we can use the wordmark here: https://bug646896.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=525605 but will need to resize it and make the text color white. The current Aurora wordmark is: Aurora: 147x38px http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/aurora/content/about-wordmark.png in addition, we also have need the wordmark for beta resize. We currently don't distinguish between beta/release for branding, but in preparation for the upcoming release on the 17th, let's resize https://bug646896.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=525607 I dont think we need to change the color as the background is white. width doesn't really matter because that doesn't interfere with the elements positioned below the wordmark; as long as we keep the width less than about 250px

Thanks Grace. Just so I'm extra clear, which ones are due right away and which ones fall into the "hardly a critical issue" category like Gavin was saying?

(In reply to comment #7) > Thanks Grace. Just so I'm extra clear, which ones are due right away and > which ones fall into the "hardly a critical issue" category like Gavin was > saying? i think it would be nice to have the beta ready for the 17th release. gavin, is it still still possible to update the beta wordmark in product for the 5.0b2 launch on the 17th? it would also be nice to have the aurora watermark updated for the aurora 6 on may 24th. but this are "nice to have" dates.

We don't want to have any code or branding differences between Beta and Release builds, so we can't have a Beta-specific wordmark. We can change the Aurora wordmark at any point, but I don't really understand the desire to change it to include both "mozilla" and "firefox". We should really discuss this in a new bug, though - do you want to file one, Grace, and CC me?

(In reply to comment #9) > We don't want to have any code or branding differences between Beta and > Release builds, so we can't have a Beta-specific wordmark. > > We can change the Aurora wordmark at any point, but I don't really > understand the desire to change it to include both "mozilla" and "firefox". > We should really discuss this in a new bug, though - do you want to file > one, Grace, and CC me? -hi gavin. found out that it's a bit more complicated for technical reasons regarding the beta vs release branding. so this one is tbd. there might also be a slight tweak with the aurora wordmark i posted. so tbd on this as well. would you like me to open a new bug for the Aurora wordmark change and assign it to you (once we have the final wordmark)? or can we continue using this bug? thanks!

yeah, a new bug would be great. thanks!

Hey guys, when do we think we will have this ready so we can get it fixed. Now that we are in Beta, we don't have much time left for changes.

(In reply to comment #12) > Hey guys, when do we think we will have this ready so we can get it fixed. > Now that we are in Beta, we don't have much time left for changes. - hi sheila, i believe they are working on new wordmarks. is there a particular one that needs to happen soon? Aurora maybe?

This bug as originally filed was about the icons and images we still need for the product - the list is in comment 0. We just need the images/icons in those sizes, but that match the new branding. Of those listed in comment 0, I think the Mac icns files (disk image/document icons) and the "document" icons are most important.

I'll look in to getting these finalized today.

I can work on these with the exception of the OS/2 icons. I don't know where to start with those or have any way to test them.

(In reply to comment #0) > "document" icon - > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/ > document.ico > > 300x236 logo+wordmark image - > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/ > content/about.png > > Mac icns files > > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/disk. > icns > > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/ > document.icns > > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/ > firefox.icns > This patch updates all of these icons. It also updates the application icons to martell's newest version that works better on dark backgrounds. > "document" icon (PNG) - > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/ > document.png > Splash screen BMP - > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/ > splash.bmp These are no longer used so I did not update them. > OS/2 ICO files > > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/ > document-os2.ico > > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/branding/nightly/ > firefox-os2.ico I don't know how to make OS/2 icons and do not have an OS/2 install to test them on. Should we contact whoever made them originally?

For the disk image icons I matched the color we are using for the Firefox button. I also updated the Firefox glyph from the old icon.

Lookin' good! thanks for building those out!

Hey guys, are we good to close this out with Stephen's post?