sync-1 Reporter
	Description • 11 years ago

Mozilla build ID:20130817041203
 DEFECT DESCRIPTION:
  MMS notifications are not properly displayed.
  REPRODUCING PROCEDURES:
 Customer Impact Statement: 
  MMS notifications are not properly displayed, e.g. in case auto retrieve is set to off only "I have sent you a file. It will be available until dd.mm.yyyy" is shown. An entry in the list for a received MMS notification shall contain the sender when it will expire as given in the received notifiaction.
 
  EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR:
 MMS notifications should contain the sender when it will expire.
 
  ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION:
 
  TEST PLAN REFERENCE:
 
  TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED:
 
  USER IMPACT:
 high
  REPRODUCING RATE:
 5/5
  For FT PR, Please list reference mobile's behavior:

	sync-1 Reporter
	Comment 1 • 11 years ago

Clone from brother

	sync-1 Reporter
	Comment 3 • 11 years ago

Clone from brother

	Vicamo Yang [:vicamo][:vyang]
	Comment 5 • 11 years ago

Wasn't the sender shown as 18661071201?

	田旻
	Comment 6 • 11 years ago

(In reply to Vicamo Yang [:vicamo][:vyang] from comment #5)
> Wasn't the sender shown as 18661071201?

It's a feedback problem from customs. They think it is neccessary to add a sender in the MMS notification area.

BTW, I have cloned a pr about this in Mozilla several days ago (bug#862171), but it was closed. Because I think other problems like translation and suject can be fixed in other bugs, I just point out this one.

	田旻
	Comment 7 • 11 years ago

(In reply to Vicamo Yang [:vicamo][:vyang] from comment #5)
> Wasn't the sender shown as 18661071201?

It's a feedback problem from customs. They think it is neccessary to add a sender in the MMS notification area.

BTW, I have cloned a pr about this in Mozilla several days ago (bug#862171), but it was closed. Because I think other problems like translation and suject can be fixed in other bugs, I just point out this one.

	田旻
	Comment 8 • 11 years ago

I give a mistake relative bug. It's not bug#862171, but bug#905026.

	Julien Wajsberg [:julienw]
	Comment 9 • 11 years ago

Ayman, what do you think about comment 6 ?

	ayman maat :maat
	Comment 10 • 11 years ago

(In reply to Julien Wajsberg [:julienw] from comment #9)
> Ayman, what do you think about comment 6 ?


Have we not already addressed this question about showing the sender several times before? ...and you state clearly in comment 11 of bug 905026...

..."2. "MMS notification": do you mean the "message" that is displayed in the thread ?
Then the "sender" is shown at the top of the view, in the header. Isn't this enough ?" 


But i notice no one has replied to you. So I will reiterate. From a UX PoV having the sender of the message in the header of the message is enough. At this point it is unnecessary to *also* display sender within the MMS message.

ni? to 田旻 and sync-1@bugzilla.tld to outline why it is felt necessary to *also* include sender in the MMS notification as well as the header in case we are missing something.

	田旻
	Comment 11 • 11 years ago

(In reply to ayman maat :maat from comment #10)
> (In reply to Julien Wajsberg [:julienw] from comment #9)
> > Ayman, what do you think about comment 6 ?
> 
> 
> Have we not already addressed this question about showing the sender several
> times before? ...and you state clearly in comment 11 of bug 905026...
> 
> ..."2. "MMS notification": do you mean the "message" that is displayed in
> the thread ?
> Then the "sender" is shown at the top of the view, in the header. Isn't this
> enough ?" 
> 
> 
> But i notice no one has replied to you. So I will reiterate. From a UX PoV
> having the sender of the message in the header of the message is enough. At
> this point it is unnecessary to *also* display sender within the MMS message.
> 
> ni? to 田旻 and sync-1@bugzilla.tld to outline why it is felt necessary to
> *also* include sender in the MMS notification as well as the header in case
> we are missing something.
Dears,
 It's feedback info from our customs, They think it's neccessary to require us to display a sender in MMS download notification. Then I will discuss this bug with my leader and give you some feedback soon.

	Joe Cheng [:jcheng] (please needinfo)
	Comment 12 • 11 years ago

it does not make sense to have this included in the general operating system.
OEM may need to customize for their customers if needed

	Julien Wajsberg [:julienw]
	Comment 13 • 11 years ago

Jack, could you please explain what is this number in the whiteboard ? Thanks !

	Julien Wajsberg [:julienw]
	Comment 14 • 11 years ago

Ok, it's quite clear we won't change this now.

Thanks!