From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6+) Gecko/20011123 BuildID: 2001112308 Does not happen on 0.9.6 release Happens only on bugzilla/mozilla webpage The icon shows when you visit the page, but hitting reload makes it dissapear. Other webpages like google.com and mandrake.com work fine Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.As above 2. 3. Actual Results: icon dissapears Expected Results: ~(actual results)

*** Bug 111674 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Sometimes even the default "bookmark" favicon dissapears

I see this using build 2001112603 on W2K, -> OS All. This happens on pages that use <link REL="icon" HEF="..."> (like mozilla.org), but not on pages that use a favicon (like mozillazine.org does, I assume). Digging a little further, I found the following: * If there is only an icon defined, it is shown in the url upon loading and disappears upon reload (see: http://www.stanford.edu/~andreasp/test/icon_only.html) * If there is only an shorticon defined, it is shown in the url upon loading and disappears upon reload (see: http://www.stanford.edu/~andreasp/test/shorticon_only.html) * If both icon and shorticon are defined, they are displayed upon loading and upon reloading (see: http://www.stanford.edu/~andreasp/test/icon_and_shorticon.html)

Using both icon and shorticon only seems to work when the "icon" link is not a .ico file. That is, this disappears on reload: <LINK rel="icon" href="X.ico" type="image/x-icon"> <LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="X.ico"> This does not: <LINK rel="icon" href="X.png" type="image/png"> <LINK rel="shortcut icon" href="X.ico">

So I tried all combinations of png and ico for icon and shorticon. nd...web site icon not displayed 1x...displays once, disappears upon reloaad ok...displayed even after reload \icon none png ico shorticon\ --------------------------------------------- none | nd 1x 1x png | 1x 1x ok ico | 1x ok 1x So it seems that the web site icon is only displayed upon reload if "icon" and "shorticon" use a different format.

Dupe of 109959?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 109959 ***

yup