Closed Bug 354226 Opened 18 years ago Closed 18 years ago

nsPostUpdateWin.js fails to update registry keys / log files after an update has been applied.

Categories

(Toolkit :: Application Update, defect)

1.8 Branch
x86
Windows Vista
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: robert.strong.bugs, Assigned: moco)

References

Details

(Keywords: fixed1.8.1.2, Whiteboard: [vista])

Attachments

(1 file, 28 obsolete files)

(deleted), patch
robert.strong.bugs
: review+
benjamin
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
When an app update is applied Vista's User Account Control (UAC) prompts the user to grant updater.exe elevated priv's to apply the update. Afetr this has completed the app runs and nsPostUpdateWin.js attempts to update registry keys and log files which fails on Vista since the app has not been granted elevated priv's.
robert just explained that the way he would recommend we fix this is to move (and port from js to C++) the code from nsPostUpdateWin.js to toolkit/mozapps/update/src/updater/updater.cpp. as for the values that nsPostUpdateWin.js determines from the application (such as vendorShortName, brandFullName, version, etc), we could have those in updater.ini, so that as updater.exe runs, and it updates the files (including updater.ini, it could then read the updated updater.ini for those values. robert: I'm not sure though how we'd handle app.update.vendorName.override and general.useragent.locale (see nsPostUpdateWin.js), as those could be override ridden by prefs, so not available for putting into updater.ini at build time.
I believe we should be able to add the locale and vendor name to the ini file as well since updater.ini is localized, etc.
Flags: blocking1.8.1.1?
taking. robert gave me a brain dump yesterday getting me up to speed on this bug and nsPostUpdateWin.js, and I've begun working on it.
Assignee: nobody → sspitzer
Whiteboard: [Fx 2.0.0.1]
per robert strong suggestion, I chatted with bsmedberg, and while he hasn't reviewed my incomplete (and not-ready-for-review) patch, he is OK with me using map, list, fstream and string from the Standard C++ library (and STL) for this windows only code.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Are you sure you want to be using std::string and not std::wstring? Won't this have issues on systems where unicode file paths are required?
> Are you sure you want to be using std::string and not std::wstring? Won't this > have issues on systems where unicode file paths are required? thanks darin, you are right. the JS code that I ported used uses JS string (which is unicode), and I should be using wstring (unicode), not string (ascii) but, when I test, I'll make sure to test on a system where unicode file paths are required.
(In reply to comment #7) > > Are you sure you want to be using std::string and not std::wstring? Won't this > > have issues on systems where unicode file paths are required? So, on Windows and VC++, 'std::wstring' is always guaranteed to be UTF-16, right? > thanks darin, you are right. > > the JS code that I ported used uses JS string (which is unicode), and I should > be using wstring (unicode), not string (ascii) The following will be done when you switch to std::wstring, but just in case ... Not only that, you also need to use 'W' APIs explicitly. Alternatively, you need to include '#define UNICODE' in files you're adding so that 'W' APIs are used implicitly. Note that we dropped the support for Win 9x/ME (see, for instance, bug 359808) so that we're free to use 'W' APIs and we MUST use them in any code we add for Gecko 1.9.
Since this code is targeted at ff 2.0.0.* the code needs to be win9x safe.
(In reply to comment #9) > Since this code is targeted at ff 2.0.0.* the code needs to be win9x safe. I'm sorry I missed that. It's a bit of irony that non-Unicode APIs need to be used to support a brand new Vista that has by far the best unicode support among Windows*. However, adding them wouldn't make any practical difference for FF 2.0 because installing FF 2.0 in a directory whose name contains characters outside the system code page does not work for various reasons (see, e.g., bug 360735 and bug 169712). However, we should not do that for Gecko 1.9 because that's going backward. I guess somehow a way to deal with the requirement(?) for a new patch to be baked in the trunk before getting landed in the branch needs to be devised, though. (land it in the trunk with an understanding that it'll be removed as soon as it's baked long enough for landing in the branch ?)
Flags: blocking1.8.1.1? → blocking1.8.1.1+
moving out for 2.0.0.2
Flags: blocking1.8.1.1+ → wanted1.8.1.x+
rob strong points out that one way to test this code (including the uninstall.log piece) is to try with a localized windows shortcut .lnk file
Attachment #245438 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch update, still a work in progress (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #246740 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch small fix, still testing and cleaning... (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #247241 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch updated patch (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
in this patch: 1) copy over all the keys from the old install, and not just "Program Folder Path". this was a problem with nsPostUpdateWin.js that rob strong pointed out a while ago. now we copy over "Start Menu Folder" "Create Quick Launch Shortcut" "Create Desktop Shortcut" and "Create Start Menu Shortcut" as well. 2) remove the ifdef around the remove() call for removing the log files 3) for DirPathsAreEqual(), make it work properly for directories without trailing slashes (by ensuring the path names have trailing slashes). 4) set the default value for certain keys, like rob does in installer.nsi. for example: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE|]\SOFTWARE\Mozilla\Mozilla Firefox\2.0.0.1 (en-US)" value is "2.0.0.1 (en-US)". (xxx todo, ask rob why we do this.) 5) fix key name to be "Comments", like installer.nsi (nsPostUpdateWin.js did "Comment", which looks like a bug, according to the msdn docs. will confirm with rob.) more code cleanup. this patch passes my first rounds of testing on Windows XP, with unicode, on an en-US system. next up: 1) work on some additional todo items from initial conversation with rob. 2) testing on Vista, Windows9x 3) test on japanese system and system with non ascii path names 4) figure out branding issues with updater.ini 5) move to xulrunner application.ini per conversation with bsmedberg
Attachment #248323 - Attachment is obsolete: true
talked to rob, and he has clarified the following open issues: > set the default value for certain keys, like rob does in installer.nsi. > for example: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE|]\SOFTWARE\Mozilla\Mozilla Firefox\2.0.0.1 > (en-US)" value is "2.0.0.1 (en-US)". (xxx todo, ask rob why we do this.) yes, we want postupdate_win.cpp to do this, following installer.nsi. I'll fix the comment in the code. > 5) fix key name to be "Comments", like installer.nsi (nsPostUpdateWin.js did > "Comment", which looks like a bug, according to the msdn docs. will confirm > with rob.) yes, this is a bug with the current nsPostUpdateWin.js which will be fixed with postupdate_win.cpp. I'll fix the comment in the code. > work on some additional todo items the remaining item (from rob's initial brain dump) is to walk the children of <ROOT>\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Uninstall, look for items with matching InstallLocation values, and remove them *before* we create the new key. working on that now.
Flags: blocking1.8.1.2+
before the holiday break, robert and I chatted about this patch and a problem. in the past, this approach worked because after installing an update, nsPostUpdateWin.js would be run when the "updated" browser would first start up. with this approach (moving the logic into updater.exe), there is a problem. If this fix is part of updater.exe for 2.0.0.2, it *will not* be run when the user upgrades to 2.0.0.2. That will execute the 2.0.0.1 updater.exe already on disk. The 2.0.0.2 updater.exe will be run when the users upgrades 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3.
Whiteboard: [Fx 2.0.0.1] → [Fx 2.0.0.1][vista]
seth: so what's the latest on this? is this patch good enough for us now? i guess fixing it now and cleaning things up in 2.0.0.3 is better than nothing. any other ideas to get around the problem you mentioned?
Whiteboard: [Fx 2.0.0.1][vista] → [Fx 2.0.0.1][vista] needs patch
> any other ideas to get around the problem you mentioned? robert strong had an interesting idea about how to get around the chicken and egg problem, which was to make firefox.exe launch updater.exe. details: 1) make the changes in this bug to updater.exe (fx 2.0.0.2) 2) make additional changes to firefox.exe (for fx 2.0.0.2) that would launch updater.exe to update the registry. the fix would be to the startup code, and it would first check if updater.exe had been run for version 2.0.0.2. 3) if not, it would run updater.exe (the new one, for fx 2.0.0.2) and updater.exe would set a new reg key indicating it had been run for version 2.0.0.2. note, for 2.0.0.1 -> 2.0.0.2, you'd get the UAC prompt twice: once for the 2.0.0.1 updater.exe, and once again for the 2.0.0.2 updater.exe launched from the startup of fx 2.0.0.2 for the update to fx 2.0.0.3 we'd only get the UAC prompt once because, the fx 2.0.0.2 updater.exe would update the registry and set the reg key indicating it had been run for 2.0.0.3, so the code firefox.exe startup would not run it again. I think this is something we could do for fx 2.0.0.2, but I like bsmedberg's idea in bug #366846 better, since it is cleaner.
when rob proposed this idea, he also mentioned that when we launched updater.exe from the startup code, we'd pass a special param so that we'd only execute the chicken-and-egg code that we cared about, and not the code to apply an update.
actually, what about this idea to solve the chicken and the egg problem, and simplify my patch: keep nsPostUpdateWin.js, but make it a simple stub that will launch updater.exe (with special arguments), but only if something has changed. nsPostUpdateWin.js already has code that reads the registry to see if something has changed, and it does not need elevated privileges to do that. if something has changed, nsPostUpdateWin.js will launch updater.exe with the following arguments: updater.exe "VendorShortName" "AppVersion" "Locale" "PlatformVersion" "AppProcessName" "BrandFullName" "URLInfoAbout" "URLUpdateInfo" in the real world, that would be something like: updater.exe "Mozilla" "2.0.0.1" "en-US" "1.8.1.1" "firefox.exe" "Mozilla Firefox" "http://www.mozilla.org/" "http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/" nsPostUpdateWin.js already has code to get these values, so it would pass them to updater.exe, and I would not need my changes to determine these values (so update.ini would not change.) I would fix updater.cpp so that, on windows only, if it got these command line arguments, only then would it call PostUpdate(), which is the C++ port of the code in nsPostUpdateWin.js that writes to the registry, updates log files, etc. as far as the chicken and the egg, that problem is solved because nsPostUpdateWin.js is executed by the updated version of firefox (fx 2.0.0.2) after update. if changes are needed, it will launch the new updater.exe (fx 2.0.0.2) which will have my fix. benjamin / robert, what do you think?
That sounds like a fine plan. Is there any particular reason to keep this functionality in updater.exe instead of a separate .exe?
correction, my example should have been something like: updater.exe "Mozilla" "2.0.0.2" "en-US" "1.8.1.2" "firefox.exe" "Mozilla Firefox" "http://www.mozilla.org/" "http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/"
> That sounds like a fine plan. Is there any particular reason to keep this > functionality in updater.exe instead of a separate .exe? thanks for the response, benjamin. as for why to use updater.exe instead of a separate .exe, i think we are going to sign updater.exe, so using updater.exe means we'll have to sign, and the user will have to trust, one less application. but I'll check that with a mozilla vista guru. I'll start on my plan. if using a separate .exe turns out to be the right thing, I'll do that.
I'm pretty sure we are signing all DLLs and EXEs now.
Attached patch continued work in progress (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #251803 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch continued work in progress (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
added code to look for SOFTWARE\Classes\FirefoxHTML\shell\open\command, and fix the value to be: <apppath> -url "%1" -requestPending also, fix DirPathsAreEqual() to be case insensitive which matters when we have FIREFOX.EXE, firefox.exe, etc.
Attachment #252417 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch continued work in progress (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
updating ddeexec keys under <root>\SOFTWARE\Classes\FirefoxHTML\shell\open
Attached patch continued work in progress (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
what's new: 1) if we update the FirefoxHTML key, ensure and set the FirefoxURL keys 2) when writing the app path to the registry, use helper method GetShortPath() 3) take care of the "URL Protocol" (thanks to robert for spotting that.) chatted with robert, and Launch() is not the right way to start up postupdater.exe. Instead, the plan is to keep the check in nsPostUpdateWin.js, but call it from startup, and use WinLaunchChild (from our startup code) to create postupdater.exe with elevated privs.
Attachment #252437 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #252477 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch continued work in progress (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
updates: 1) port over robert's "clean up ifexec" cruft from the installer 2) fix the "-requestPending" for the following protocols HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, GOPHER
Attachment #252543 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch continued work in progress (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
fix the Launch() vs WinLaunchChild() problem by adding a new interface, nsIPostUpdaterLauncher, which is only built on windows. the nsXULAppInfo singleton implements it (again, only on windows). nsPostUpdateWin.js uses the launch() method of this interface to call WinLaunchChild() with the path to postupdater.exe.
Attachment #252549 - Attachment is obsolete: true
> chatted with robert, and Launch() is not the right way to start up > postupdater.exe. Really? We will have to use ShellExecute (which is used by nsLocalFile::Launch()) rather than CreateProcess (which is used by WinLaunchChild()) at least until Fx 2.0.0.3. Although this patch is for Fx 2.0.0.2, it is not a good practice to depend on compatibility shims.
We are going to need to request elevation the same way as the patch you wrote in bug 351949.
robert had a *fantastic* idea this morning to simplify the solution to this bug: 1) fix nsPostUpdateWin.js to not do any registry writing / creating. that will all be done by the uninstaller exe, which already has this functionality and branding strings. 2) fix nsPostUpdateWin.js to keep all the log file clean up code, but write the results to a temp log file, one that does not require firefox.exe to have elevated privs. 3) remove postupdater.exe / postupdater.ini, not longer needed. 4) nsPostUpdaterWin.js will make a check (still to be decided) and will launch (using the nsIPostUpdaterLaunch interface, to be renamed to nsIPostUpdateWinCleanup) the uninstaller exe with a command line argument (to indicate "do registry update cleanup") and the path to the temp log file. the uninstaller exe will be launched with WinLaunchChild() and will (soon) do so and and ask for elevated privs. It will do all the reg cleanup, and since it is elevated, it can move the log into the right place (where nsPostUpdateWin.js can not, as firefox.exe is not elevated.) 5) additionally, in nsWindowsShellService::SetDefaultBrowser(), robert can write the C++ version of this code to launch the uninstaller process: var app = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/xre/app-info;1"]. getService(Components.interfaces.nsIXULAppInfo). QueryInterface(Components.interfaces.nsIPostUpdateWinCleanup); app.makeDefault(); I'll go make my small part of these changes, and attach a patch for the trunk.
Attached patch patch for my (small) side of the plan. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #252616 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch a trunk version (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #252867 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #252870 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #252875 - Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla)
Attached patch updated patch, per rob strong (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
nsPostUpdateWin.js is currently firefox specific (as it uses FirefoxHTML as it's magic check). so for now, disable calling it unless MOZ_PHOENIX.
Attachment #252875 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #252877 - Flags: review?
Attachment #252875 - Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla)
Attachment #252877 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #252883 - Flags: review?
Attachment #252877 - Flags: review?
Attachment #252883 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #252885 - Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla)
Attachment #252883 - Flags: review?
Attached patch oops, / not \ (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #252885 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #252885 - Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla)
mscott: for thunderbird, there are three places we need to worry about: 1) in nsPostUpdateWindow.js, we'll need to fix checkRegistry() [not yet landed] for tbird. for firefox, we look for the -requestPending (part of robert's dde work for firefox) on the FirefoxHTML key. +function checkRegistry() +{ + // XXX todo + // this is firefox specific + // figure out what to do about tbird and sunbird, etc + LOG("checkRegistry"); + + var result = false; + try { + var key = new RegKey(); + key.open(RegKey.prototype.ROOT_KEY_CLASSES_ROOT, "FirefoxHTML\\shell\\open\\command", key.ACCESS_READ); + var commandKey = key.readStringValue(""); + LOG("commandKey = " + commandKey); + // if "-requestPending" is not found, we need to do the cleanup + result = (commandKey.indexOf("-requestPending") == -1); 2) mozapps/update/src/nsUpdateService.js.in +#ifdef MOZ_PHOENIX + // for now, this is firefox only. + // we need to fix both nsPostUpdateWin.js and + // the uninstaller to work for thunderbird and sunbird + // // Perform platform-specific post-update processing. if (POST_UPDATE_CONTRACTID in Components.classes) { Components.classes[POST_UPDATE_CONTRACTID]. createInstance(Components.interfaces.nsIRunnable).run(); } +#endif once we fix nsPostUpdateWin.js to be tbird friendly we can remove that ifdef. 3) we'd need a thunderbirdHelper.exe (see #368353, it's an app based on our NSIS uninstaller that does all the log copying and registry clean up that nsPostUpdateWin.js used to do.) I'll log a spin on bug on these issues.
Whiteboard: [Fx 2.0.0.1][vista] needs patch → [Fx 2.0.0.1][vista] have patch, need cleanup, self review, and :rs review
> I'll log a spin on bug on these issues. see bug #368362
Attachment #253264 - Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla)
Comment on attachment 253264 [details] [diff] [review] updated to log if app.update.log.PostUpdate (or app.update.log.all) is set, and some other changes, per robert strong seeking additional review from bsmedberg. robert wanted me to ask bsmedberg for his opinion on the nsIWinAppHelper name.
Attachment #253264 - Flags: review?(benjamin)
Comment on attachment 253264 [details] [diff] [review] updated to log if app.update.log.PostUpdate (or app.update.log.all) is set, and some other changes, per robert strong HelperApp should be AppHelper... Seth said he would resubmit if I give him a pony
Attachment #253264 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #253264 - Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla)
Attachment #253264 - Flags: review?(benjamin)
Attached patch for my pony (deleted) — Splinter Review
this matches what robert checked into the trunk.
Attachment #253292 - Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla)
Comment on attachment 253292 [details] [diff] [review] for my pony seeking additional review from bsmedberg
Attachment #253292 - Flags: review?(benjamin)
Attachment #253292 - Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla) → review+
fixed landed (by robert strong) on the trunk. still need to back port to the MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH. thanks again to robert for his idea (in comment #41) that greatly simplified this fix. (note to bsmedberg, I would still like a review from you, especially of the interface name and build changes.)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment on attachment 253292 [details] [diff] [review] for my pony I vaguely don't like the name "helper.exe" or nsIWinAppHelper, but I don't have a better suggestion, so r=me ;-)
Attachment #253292 - Flags: review?(benjamin) → review+
the #ifdef MOZ_PHOENIX change to nsUpdateService.js.in was not checked in, but we want it. I've checked it in, but I'll spin up a new bug about it, so that we don't forget to backport it to the MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH. additionally, I'll mscott and lilmatt know about it, and what it means for mail and calendar.
fixed on the branch.
Keywords: fixed1.8.1.2
Blocks: 369465
No longer blocks: 352420
Whiteboard: [Fx 2.0.0.1][vista] have patch, need cleanup, self review, and :rs review → [vista]
Product: Firefox → Toolkit
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: