Closed
Bug 698425
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
need single locale builds for native UI mobile release
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: chofmann, Assigned: mozilla)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [l10n][android native UI])
Attachments
(5 files, 5 obsolete files)
(deleted),
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
mozilla
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
Pike
:
feedback+
mozilla
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
(deleted),
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
mozilla
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
mozilla
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
the locale picker has been turned off in bug 694047, until we figure out if or how it makes sense to package up which locales with the new android native UI builds.
while we do the research to figure out how we want to do this, and create the right arrangement of locales, we will need individual locales to be packaged up and shipped for testing.
this is to get this action item on the build teams priority list.
we will probably have the first localizations ready for packaging and testing in a couple of weeks, as soon as a bit of the UI is nailed down, and the localization file structure is set up. will add dependencies for those bugs as needed.
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Moving this to release engineering, and fixing up deps.
releng, would you please file a bug on fennec native on what "APIs" you want for the single-locale builds? I.e., which make targets should do what? CC me on those, too?
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to chris hofmann from comment #2)
> we will probably have the first localizations ready for packaging and
> testing in a couple of weeks, as soon as a bit of the UI is nailed down, and
> the localization file structure is set up. will add dependencies for those
> bugs as needed.
Any dep.bugs where we can track progress for this?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
We have never successfully repacked an apk; the main culprit, iirc, is the binary manifest.
We may see more success if we repackage the apk using similar logic to a 'make package'. The main issue here is that we won't have a populated objdir in an l10n repack situation.
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Hrm. Yeah, the resources.arsc is probably a bitch. Even if we find the android build fragment that generates that, we may very well end up with some android-sdk-internal java class that they change happily.
I wonder if we can do something in the middle, like we do for tests. Create an intermediate tar ball and upload that to ftp and use it for packaging up single-locale builds.
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
More thoughts:
We probably want the localized content to be in res/values/strings.xml and not res/values-ab-rCD/strings.xml, as that keeps the door open to not set the locale at all.
Also, if the process here happens to recreated classes.dex, that'd probably be a feature. Going forward, we may want to switch our localization infrastructure to something that'd generate java code per locale.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
Taking the releng portion; per today's meeting Axel's going to work on getting the repack working (thanks Axel!)
Assignee: nobody → aki
Whiteboard: [l10n][android native UI][triagefollowup] → [l10n][android native UI]
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
If Axel's right and the Android single locale makefiles are backwards compatible with existing logic, this may Just Work. I'll verify in staging.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Not needed, but I noticed this and we might as well clean this up.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'buildbot-configs/mozilla2/android/mozilla-central/nightly/l10n-mozconfig'
Gotta add these to my patch.
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
FYI, the only modification I'm doing to the mozconfig is to add a --with-l10n-base.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•13 years ago
|
||
Copied macosx-mobile's l10n-mozconfigs and changed the --enable-application line.
Attachment #579862 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #579862 -
Flags: feedback?(bhearsum)
Comment 12•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 579862 [details] [diff] [review]
android + android-xul l10n mozconfigs
r-, I'd rather use the actual build mozconfigs and tweak them. In particular, I'm not confident that --disable-compile-environment does the right thing 100%.
Also, I think we want to make the change through the channels as native progresses, and not all at once, right?
Attachment #579862 -
Flags: review?(l10n) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•13 years ago
|
||
I'd rather land them all at once, since we already have a large and growing number of items to remember to merge over the next 3 merge days.
--disable-compile-environment works just fine for existing mobile l10n-mozconfigs, but I can look at copying the build mozconfigs.
Comment 14•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #12)
> Comment on attachment 579862 [details] [diff] [review]
> android + android-xul l10n mozconfigs
>
> r-, I'd rather use the actual build mozconfigs and tweak them. In
> particular, I'm not confident that --disable-compile-environment does the
> right thing 100%.
Are you talking about tweaking at runtime?
Comment 15•13 years ago
|
||
Here's my thinking:
--disable-compile-environment is for folks that don't do a whole lot of set up and install of compilers and dev lib packages and whatnot. Just a few usually available tools or mozillabuild.
The android sdk kinda falls out of that, IMHO.
Now, most checks in configure aren't reviewed with respect to --disable-compile-environment, and I confess I haven't bothered for probably a year if all the checks it's doing are in the right place.
Thus my recommendation: For mobile, as it's requiring an SDK and stuff, let's not pretend we don't need a compile environment for the repacks.
Practical implications for releng should be zilch I guess, as all slaves are set up to do anything anyway, right?
Re the branch landings, if the mobile/android stuff isn't triggered before it's walking up the channels, I don't mind either way.
Comment 16•13 years ago
|
||
That makes complete sense to me, but I still don't understand what you mean by "I'd rather use the actual build mozconfigs and tweak them.". With this new context I _think_ it means: overwrite the existing l10n configs with the build configs, add whatever options we need for l10n, commit them.
Is that right?
Comment 17•13 years ago
|
||
Yes.
Comment 18•13 years ago
|
||
Great! WFM too!
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•13 years ago
|
||
This is a bit more involved.
I added the l10n-base, and otherwise kept the l10n-mozconfig the exact same as the existing nightly or release mozconfig, except I bumped the android sdk, tools, and toolchain to match Firefox 11.
These won't be in use until Firefox 11 merges into those repos, anyway, so I'm just doing the legwork ahead of time.
I'm going to attach a diff of each mozconfig vs each l10n-mozconfig right after this for easier review.
Attachment #579862 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #579862 -
Flags: feedback?(bhearsum)
Attachment #580500 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #580500 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•13 years ago
|
||
Output of
for l in `find mozilla2/android{,-xul} -name l10n-mozconfig`; do n=`echo $l | sed -e 's/l10n-//'`; echo $l; diff -U9 $n $l ; done
If I'm updating the mozilla-release mozconfigs ahead of time for l10n-mozconfig, I kind of might as well do it for the release and nightly mozconfigs too, since android and android-xul won't build on mozilla-release until Firefox 11 merges in. I'm happy to add that to the patch if wanted.
Comment 21•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 580500 [details] [diff] [review]
android + android-xul l10n mozconfigs take 2
Review of attachment 580500 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This looks very consistent and makes sense to me, which is as much as I understand about buildbot-configs. I'll make this a feedback+ flag instead of an r+
Attachment #580500 -
Flags: review?(l10n) → feedback+
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•13 years ago
|
||
command: make wget-en-US
command: cwd: mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales
command: env: {'UPLOAD_USER': 'ffxbld', 'EN_US_BINARY_URL': 'http://dev-stage01.build.sjc1.mozilla.com/pub/mozilla.org/mobile/nightly/latest-mozilla-central-android', 'MOZ_OBJDIR': 'obj-l10n', 'UPLOAD_SSH_KEY': '~/.ssh/ffxbld_dsa', 'UPLOAD_HOST': 'dev-stage01.build.sjc1.mozilla.com', 'UPLOAD_TO_TEMP': '1'}
command: output:
/bin/sh: /builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-3/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/config/nsinstall: No such file or directory
/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-3/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/config/nsinstall -D /builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-3/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/
make: /builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-3/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/config/nsinstall: Command not found
make: *** [wget-en-US] Error 127
command: END (0.07s elapsed)
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•13 years ago
|
||
[cltbld@linux-ix-slave05 obj-l10n]$ pwd
/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-3/mozilla-central/obj-l10n
[cltbld@linux-ix-slave05 obj-l10n]$ find . -name nsinstall
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•13 years ago
|
||
Looks like a 'make nsinstall' in obj-l10n/config fixes this.
Should I add this in the script, or should it be a makefile dependency?
Comment 25•13 years ago
|
||
We should add this to the script. either
make -C config
or
make tier_base
should do the trick. tier_base does a whole lot more things on android, which I'm not exactly sure why, so I don't know if using that is a pro or a con. tier_base does include config, though, so that'd be on the safe side.
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•13 years ago
|
||
I think that's going to get me past the repack portion; testing to verify.
Another issue I'm hitting is that we're triggering the l10n repacks after the multilocale upload, not after the en-US upload, which is wrong.
This will take a not-insignificant amount of MercurialBuildFactory refactoring, but I think I know what to do.
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Aki Sasaki [:aki] from comment #26)
> I think that's going to get me past the repack portion; testing to verify.
> Another issue I'm hitting is that we're triggering the l10n repacks after
> the multilocale upload, not after the en-US upload, which is wrong.
> This will take a not-insignificant amount of MercurialBuildFactory
> refactoring, but I think I know what to do.
Nope, not an issue: wget-en-US grabs the right apk.
However, in 4 of the 5 repack scripts, during make unpack I'm hitting this:
extracting: update.locale
inflating: removed-files
inflating: recommended-addons.json
inflating: classes.dex
/bin/sh: line 1: cd: fennec: No such file or directory
make: *** [/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-2/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec] Error 1
command: END (0.52s elapsed)
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•13 years ago
|
||
This should fix the en-US subdir issue when we build multilocale.
However, I'm still hitting the above error after clobbering and retriggering.
Comment 29•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Aki Sasaki [:aki] from comment #27)
> Nope, not an issue: wget-en-US grabs the right apk.
> However, in 4 of the 5 repack scripts, during make unpack I'm hitting this:
>
> extracting: update.locale
> inflating: removed-files
> inflating: recommended-addons.json
> inflating: classes.dex
> /bin/sh: line 1: cd: fennec: No such file or directory
> make: ***
> [/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-2/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/
> locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec] Error 1
> command: END (0.52s elapsed)
Not sure what this means, in particular the "4 of the 5" part. Do you have STR?
Comment 30•13 years ago
|
||
PS: stas can reproduce this, it looks like a problem with having omnijar on now.
The solution will be to make INNER_UNMAKE_PACKAGE not change the working directory.
Assignee | ||
Comment 31•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #29)
> Not sure what this means, in particular the "4 of the 5" part. Do you have
> STR?
I think this was because I was futzing manually on the slave and not clobbering.
When I rm -rf'ed all workdirs and kicked off all the scripts, I failed on 5/5.
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #30)
> PS: stas can reproduce this, it looks like a problem with having omnijar on
> now.
>
> The solution will be to make INNER_UNMAKE_PACKAGE not change the working
> directory.
Awesome, good to hear!
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•13 years ago
|
||
Right now it looks like I need the patch in bug 709980 to land on m-c, then set JARSIGNER for Android repacks like we do for Android builds.
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•13 years ago
|
||
This isn't ideal, but saves me from having to add a SetProperty step to ScriptFactory, which would just make me feel dirty. (This needs to be an abs_path).
If there's a lot of pushback here, I may end up porting these scripts to mozharness sooner rather than later.
Attachment #580601 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 34•13 years ago
|
||
I think we should have everything in place to do the single-locale builds on central.
For aurora, the latest patch in bug 709980 still needs to land there as well.
Comment 35•13 years ago
|
||
Aurora landed, too.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Blocks: hg-automation
Assignee | ||
Comment 36•13 years ago
|
||
I'm getting a lot of this:
make clobber-zip AB_CD=en-US
make[1]: Entering directory `/builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales'
rm -f /builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/chrome/en-US.jar \
/builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/chrome/en-US.manifest \
/builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/defaults/pref/mobile-l10n.js
rm -f -r /builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/dictionaries \
/builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/hyphenation \
/builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/defaults/profile \
/builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/chrome/en-US
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales'
make[1]: Entering directory `/builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales'
make: Entering an unknown directory
make: Leaving an unknown directory
make: *** ../../../mobile/locales: No such file or directory. Stop.
make[1]: *** [libs-da] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builds/slave/m-aurora-andrd-l10n-1/mozilla-aurora/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales'
make: *** [repackage-zip-da] Error 2
command: END (0.61s elapsed)
m-c too:
make clobber-zip AB_CD=en-US
make[1]: Entering directory `/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales'
rm -f /builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/chrome/en-US.jar \
/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/chrome/en-US.manifest \
/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/defaults/pref/mobile-l10n.js
rm -f -r /builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/dictionaries \
/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/hyphenation \
/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/defaults/profile \
/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales/../../../dist/l10n-stage/fennec/chrome/en-US
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales'
make[1]: Entering directory `/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales'
make: Entering an unknown directory
make: Leaving an unknown directory
make: *** ../../../mobile/locales: No such file or directory. Stop.
make[1]: *** [libs-sk] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-l10n-4/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/android/locales'
make: *** [repackage-zip-sk] Error 2
command: END (0.62s elapsed)
Comment 37•13 years ago
|
||
Filed bug 716842, with a patch. Sorry.
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #579500 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #579498 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•13 years ago
|
||
Now that various android + android-xul mozconfig fixes have landed, the diff between the mozconfigs and the l10n-mozconfigs is only a comment + the --with-l10n-base line.
Attachment #580501 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 39•13 years ago
|
||
So mobile/android is looking good.
mobile/xul isn't:
adding: update.locale (stored 0%)
make: Entering an unknown directory
make: Leaving an unknown directory
make: *** /builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-xul-l10n-2/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/xul/locales/../../../embedding/android: No such file or directory. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-xul-l10n-2/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/xul/locales'
make[1]: *** [repackage-zip] Error 2
make: *** [repackage-zip-et] Error 2
command: END (2.82s elapsed)
I'm going to also make sure that my tools changes don't break mobile desktop l10n repacks, although we'll probably turn those off once this lands.
Comment 40•13 years ago
|
||
I'd think that embedding/android should be set up in http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/toolkit-makefiles.sh#621, as long as "$MOZ_WIDGET_TOOLKIT" = "android" and "$MOZ_BUILD_APP" = "mobile/xul". Is that true for how you trigger the xul repacks?
Comment 41•13 years ago
|
||
Ed apparently broke this in http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9a1a4157bf49, no bug, rs=build.
wokbok:mozilla-central axelhecht$ hg diff toolkit/toolkit-makefiles.sh
diff --git a/toolkit/toolkit-makefiles.sh b/toolkit/toolkit-makefiles.sh
--- a/toolkit/toolkit-makefiles.sh
+++ b/toolkit/toolkit-makefiles.sh
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@
netwerk/system/android/Makefile
widget/android/Makefile
"
- if [ "$MOZ_BUILD_APP" = "mobile/xul" -o "$MOZ_BUILD_APP" = "b2g"]; then
+ if [ "$MOZ_BUILD_APP" = "mobile/xul" -o "$MOZ_BUILD_APP" = "b2g" ]; then
add_makefiles "
embedding/android/Makefile
embedding/android/locales/Makefile
is the difference between life and death.
I'd be happy if someone could fix this while I'm in bed.
Comment 42•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #41)
> - if [ "$MOZ_BUILD_APP" = "mobile/xul" -o "$MOZ_BUILD_APP" = "b2g"]; then
> + if [ "$MOZ_BUILD_APP" = "mobile/xul" -o "$MOZ_BUILD_APP" = "b2g" ]; then
> ...
> is the difference between life and death.
Sorry Axel/Aki, fixed in:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b386494d97eb
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #580500 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #579500 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 43•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 580500 [details] [diff] [review]
android + android-xul l10n mozconfigs take 2
http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/6a878eed7678
Attachment #580500 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 44•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 579500 [details] [diff] [review]
just cleanup, buildbotcustom
http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbotcustom/rev/dfdecce2fcae
Attachment #579500 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 45•13 years ago
|
||
This patch:
* adds JARSIGNER which adds nightly-key signing for android (needed for nightlies; needed for releases if we want to test on the tegras);
* edits the en-US binary url for nightlies that are multilocale (en-US subdir);
* adds the 'config' directory to makeDirs for android only. I'm not fond of this, but right now I'm leaning towards leaving it for a followup bug so we can get single locale repacks.
Tested android repacks (successful), linux mobile beta repacks (successful on the cmdln; the manually triggered ones weren't getting the script_repo_revision property for some reason, but I think that's unrelated to my patches).
Android-xul is still failing, but I'm leaning towards filing a Fennec l10n bug and not blocking on that. Error:
make[2]: Entering directory `/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-xul-l10n-1/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/embedding/android'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-xul-l10n-1/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/embedding/android'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `res/values/strings.xml', needed by `gecko.ap_'. Stop.
make[1]: *** [repackage-zip] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builds/slave/m-cen-andrd-xul-l10n-1/mozilla-central/obj-l10n/mobile/xul/locales'
make: *** [repackage-zip-es-ES] Error 2
command: END (2.03s elapsed)
Attachment #582409 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #587900 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Assignee | ||
Comment 46•13 years ago
|
||
This enables the nightly repacks for android and android-xul on m-c and m-a.
If the android-xul error above is a blocking issue, I can wait to enable android-xul until it's resolved; otherwise I'm leaning towards turning them on.
Attachment #587901 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Assignee | ||
Comment 47•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Aki Sasaki [:aki] from comment #45)
> Android-xul is still failing, but I'm leaning towards filing a Fennec l10n
> bug and not blocking on that.
Filed bug 717522 for this issue as well as no xpis.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #587900 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #587901 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 48•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 587900 [details] [diff] [review]
working mobile l10n scripts
http://hg.mozilla.org/build/tools/rev/b4d779f50414
Attachment #587900 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 49•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 587901 [details] [diff] [review]
enable android and android-xul single locale nightly repacks
http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/892ec4c2fc4e
Android and android-xul single locale repacks should happen after the first m-c and m-a nightlies after the next reconfig (later today?)
Attachment #587901 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 50•13 years ago
|
||
We're live; we should get android single locale repacks tonight.
I'll be working on android signing + update snippets next, then partner repacks.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 51•13 years ago
|
||
Hey Aki, this is great news. where will the builds start showing up? some place lkke ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/nightly/latest-mozilla-aurora-android/ ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 52•13 years ago
|
||
These seem not to be enabled in production for some reason.
Reopening to track that down.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 53•13 years ago
|
||
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago → 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 54•13 years ago
|
||
yeah! thanks a lot. same thing is needed for aurora since that is where most of the localization work happens. will aurora builds show up soon too?
Assignee | ||
Comment 55•13 years ago
|
||
Kicked off an aurora nightly (just now); when it finishes the l10n repack jobs should fire.
Assignee | ||
Comment 56•13 years ago
|
||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•