Closed
Bug 912192
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
cppunit tests scheduling changes
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: emorley, Assigned: kmoir)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [capacity])
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
patch
|
rail
:
review+
kmoir
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We should stop scheduling the fedora jobs :-)
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Cedar&showall=1&jobname=cpp
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Ed, should we be doing these for release builds?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dan Minor [:dminor] from comment #1)
> Ed, should we be doing these for release builds?
Define release?
There are no cppunit tests being scheduled on https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Release&showall=1&jobname=cpp
Normally when introducing a new test suite, we let it propagate through the various release branches {aurora, beta, release} on the usual 6 week cadence.
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Sorry, by release I meant 'opt' builds.
If things continue to look green, I think we should expand these beyond Cedar soon. These tests run now as part of make check, so I don't expect them to give too much trouble.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dan Minor [:dminor] from comment #3)
> Sorry, by release I meant 'opt' builds.
>
> If things continue to look green, I think we should expand these beyond
> Cedar soon. These tests run now as part of make check, so I don't expect
> them to give too much trouble.
Ah I see (the 'opt' builds aren't actually what we release, 'pgo' is closer, 'nightly' closer still, but not 100%... but that's another mini rant! :-)).
I'm not sure -- ted, should the cppunit tests be run on opt builds too?
Flags: needinfo?(ted)
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
We should be running them on all of opt, debug and pgo. They currently get run during the "make check" portion of builds, but we should turn that off when we're satisfied with the standalone job (before we turn them on on m-c and related branches, presumably).
Flags: needinfo?(ted)
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
(But comment 0 is correct in that we don't need to be running them on Fedora, just Ubuntu.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
Thanks Ted! :-)
New summary of desired changes:
* Stop scheduling cppunit tests on fedora (we just want ubuntu).
* Also schedule them on opt/pgo, since they're currently only switched on for debug.
Summary: cppunit tests are being scheduled on both fedora and ubuntu on cedar → cppunit tests scheduling changes
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
I can look at this after testing my changes in bug 912997 for adding jit tests.
Assignee: nobody → kmoir
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #805361 -
Flags: review?(rail)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #805361 -
Flags: review?(rail) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #805361 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
In production
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Reopening because changes in bug 892569 had to be reverted.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
oops reopened wrong bug should have been bug 920989
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•