Closed Bug 1437157 Opened 7 years ago Closed 6 years ago

Increase coverage of Stack Labels

Categories

(Core :: Gecko Profiler, enhancement, P1)

Product:
Core
Component:
Gecko Profiler
Type:
enhancement

Tracking

()

Status:
RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: gregtatum, Assigned: canova)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Now that PseudoStacks are cheaper, we should instrument more of Gecko to provide better annotations. This information will then more useful to expose to perf.html. ❏ Evaluate Script (AutoEntryScript) ❏ Regex matching ❏ Regex compilation ❏ Script load (entry point to JS execution) ❏ Baseline compilation ❏ Ion compilation ❏ CSS parsing ❏ Selector matching ❏ Style flush ❏ Frame construction ❏ Dll loading ❏ Network ❏ All things that call into JS ❏ DOM event ❏ Initial layout ❏ JS parsing ❏ Load JSM ❏ DestroyWindowEvent ❏ Incremental marking ❏ ForgetSkippable ❏ CC ❏ GC ❏ WebIDL call ❏ Event loop / idle ❏ HTML parsing ❏ Layout Flush ❏ Refresh Tick
Priority: -- → P1
Blocks: 1329161
Summary: Increase coverage of PseudoStack entires → Increase coverage of PseudoStack entries
Summary: Increase coverage of PseudoStack entries → Increase coverage of Stack Labels
Assignee: nobody → canaltinova
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Depends on: 1414345
So, after the bug 1478393, it appears everything is finished on my list. The other label frames on that list were already added. Markus, can we close this now?
Flags: needinfo?(mstange)
Depends on: 1480496
Depends on: 1480499
I've filed bug 1480496 and bug 1480499 for two more that I found in my notes, but after those we can close this.s
Flags: needinfo?(mstange)
I'm closing this since other bugs are fixed now. Thanks Markus!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Maybe bug 1442665 is in the scope of this bug too ? What do you think Nazim and Markus ?
It looks like it's not in the list above but yes, we can also work on this bug as a next step.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.