Closed
Bug 43429
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Proxy: Support multiple proxy configurations (in one profile)
Categories
(Core :: Networking, enhancement)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: Sebastian, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: helpwanted)
From n.p.m.wishlist:
"It would be nice to support multiple proxies within the same profile depending
on the current ISP like IE5 does it."
It would be indeed a nice feature, however I don't know how feasible this is for
two reasons:
a) it would have to be handled totally different for different platforms and
b) is mozilla aware of the type of network connection (ISP) it uses to connect?
IE5 has in this case the advantage of being part of the OS.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
adding my proposals for an "advanced proxy support" from bug 59969:
- make mozilla auto detect, if the proxy uses http 1.0 or 1.1 (see bug 38488), (no
more debug prefs needed, which aren't available through "preferences" in ns6)
- support multiple proxy configurations, e.g. one config without proxys (direct
connection at home), one with a proxy (at work), another with a different proxy
(say, second ISP at home or a temporary configuration if you are on holidays
etc.). this would be really cool for laptop users! you should be able to apply
to the configurations through the preferences. i imagine a drop-down menu.
- do proxy configuration during profile creation
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Taking bug.
> a) it would have to be handled totally different for different platforms
The user would have to manually select the ISP, until we have code that
intergrates with the OS. Still better than 2 profiles or manually changing
prefs. I suggest to use the offline function, i.e. turning the 2 states "online"
and "offline" into "offline", "custom" (uses proxies from user prefs) and once
for each provider.
The data (the proxies for each ISP and the ISP name) could (and should, at least
at some level) come from the ISP files, which we have in Mailnews anyway.
Assignee: gagan → ben.bucksch
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
If anybody wants to fix this, take the bug.
can this bug can be fixed using PAC?
or maybe we need a way to tell which connection is being used? (that would be
platform specific I guess)
PAC solves it, but you have to keep changing the PAC URL in the Prefs UI.
This is another piece of functionality that fits under what I am proposing for
bug 89928.
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
this bug is improtant for users who uses ad filter proxys.
mozilla should have more a status switch than a offline/online button to choose
which proxy or setting should be used. if you see that a wrong content is
filtered it is so complicated to turn of the proxy or select another.
Summary: [RFE] Multiple proxy for different ISPs → [RFE] Proxy: Multiple configs for different ISPs
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 148977 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Summary: [RFE] Proxy: Multiple configs for different ISPs → Proxy: Multiple configs for different ISPs
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
I think this bug is several in one: there should be support for multiple
preconfigered proxies. Proxy configs would have names and should be
selectable easily and quickly.
The reason for this is that multiple ISPs is not the only reason for
having several proxies - here are a few others: using a local ad/popup
filter proxy like privoxy or webwasher, using an anonymizer proxy like jap,
accessing a remote intranet server via a ssh tunnel which requires setting
the proxy to 127.0.0.1, using different proxies to speed up different groups
of web pages etc.
So having a means to easily and comfortably switch between preconfigured proxies
would be useful for all these situations *and* a first step to make it easier
to deal with different ISPs.
Then, in a second step (and second bug?) we could add a feature to
automatically select one of these proxies depending on the ISP.
One note about a portable way to implement that aut-selction: wouldn't it
be possible to do this based on a pattern of the own hostname and/or IP?
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
Taken to the most robust implementation, you are talking about bug 88218.
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 189746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 199766 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18•21 years ago
|
||
I've made some comments about how to store proxy config data (and implement
prefs UI) in bug 88218.
Summary: Proxy: Multiple configs for different ISPs → Proxy: Support multiple proxy configurations (in one profile)
Comment 19•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 100523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20•21 years ago
|
||
I agree with the need for multiple proxy servers/configurations (ala DNS?). We
have three choices at the moment, automatic, manual, and direct connection. When
traipsing about the globe or just moving from office to home, it is frustrating
to have to keep looking up and manually changing the proxy server. I now have
four proxies that I must use regularly. Automatic proxy selection would be nice,
but even a drop-down list would be helpful.
Comment 21•21 years ago
|
||
Although I've yet to actually use it (installed, but not utilised), the Switch
Proxy extension looks to be quite useful in this sense.
http://jgillick.nettripper.com/switchproxy/
Comment 22•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 274693 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23•19 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 334810 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24•18 years ago
|
||
NOTE: many users simply need a SECOND proxy "profile", because they use different proxies at home vs. work.
Using a simple PAC file can get you around that.
Updated•18 years ago
|
Priority: P3 → --
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Comment 25•9 years ago
|
||
This isn't on anyone's work list and realistically is an abandoned idea. I will close as wontfix - if someone has a patch or is actively going to work on it please reopen. (but please, only then.)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•