Closed
Bug 477844
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
DOM Inspector 2.0.4
Categories
(Other Applications :: DOM Inspector, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: sdwilsh, Assigned: sdwilsh)
References
Details
(Keywords: meta)
Folks - please don't add bugs to the dependent list. If you think a bug should
be in the release, add a comment and I'll agree/disagree with my reasoning.
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → sdwilsh
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Bug 400095 !?
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
If someone fixes it, sure, but I surely don't have the cycles.
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Bug 391955 !?
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
In fact, comment 2 pretty much applies to anything. I'll promise to be quick with reviews.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
I think this might be ready to go out. Neil - any objections?
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
The only issue I've had with it recently is that my recollection of the insert node dialog was that it was supposed to default to creating XUL elements in XUL documents and HTML elements in XHTML documents, whereas currently it default to creating elements with no namespace in either type of document.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
AFAIK that was always the case - it would call document.createElement unless a namespace was specified, and that means it'd get the namespace of the document. Is that not happening anymore?
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
No, I might have misunderstood but I every time I create an element in a XUL document I have to select "XUL" or "Document default" from the list; I could be wrong but I doubt that selecting "null" should do that but I couldn't remember whether "Document default" should be selected by default.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
I'm 95% sure the behavior hasn't changed.
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
Bug 524113? It's a trivial change.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10)
> Bug 524113? It's a trivial change.
If somebody provides a patch, sure. I don't have the cycles for it at the moment, but I was going to wait about a week longer for locales to update their localization.
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
There you go, formalized patch adding that line.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
Uploaded to AMO.
http://hg.mozilla.org/dom-inspector/rev/18a1c983c8ee
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
Could you ping AMO editors to get it out of sandbox? Maybe also adding the "trusted" bit so that further updates won't be delayed by the review queue?
Right now automatic update doesn't find the new version leaving 3.6b users with not fully working inspector.
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
Still version 2.0.3 on https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6622
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
Waiting for approval still. I sent mail to amo-editors, but have not had any response.
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•15 years ago
|
||
Somehow I neglected to nominate it. Weird. Anywho, the update is out, and the add-on is now trusted.
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•15 years ago
|
||
Filed bug 530187 for 2.0.5
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•