Folks - please don't add bugs to the dependent list. If you think a bug should be in the release, add a comment and I'll agree/disagree with my reasoning.

it would be nice to consider the bug 532024.

bug 532032 as well

Are there any objections to me pushing this update out next week?

bug 424527 is essentially fixed

Yeah, but not worth noting in the release notes, so I don't need to track it. The dependency list is largely used by me to write up the release notes when I submit a new version to AMO.

bug 548139 if this isn't going out really soon, please.

Colby - would you be willing to generate a build and attach it here for uploading to AMO? Please include the changeset you built off of.

http://hg.mozilla.org/dom-inspector/rev/c1b38e365772 Does the repo need to be tagged? Should I resolve this bug?

(In reply to comment #8) > http://hg.mozilla.org/dom-inspector/rev/c1b38e365772 > > Does the repo need to be tagged? Should I resolve this bug? Yeah, we need to tag it like all the rest of the releases. The dependency list contains all the fixes, right (need this for coming up with a changelog)?

(In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > http://hg.mozilla.org/dom-inspector/rev/c1b38e365772 > > > > Does the repo need to be tagged? Should I resolve this bug? > Yeah, we need to tag it like all the rest of the releases. http://hg.mozilla.org/dom-inspector/rev/a85ba8bde95a added tag DOMI_2_0_5_RELEASE for changeset c1b38e365772 > The dependency list contains all the fixes, right (need this for coming up > with a changelog)? As far as I know, it does.

Uploaded to AMO: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addons/versions/6622 The release notes haven't been updated, but I submitted the form with these (takes a few hours for the cache to pick up on it): This version contains the following fixes: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393355">Bug 393355</a> - make accessibilityEvents view to filter events (patch by Alexander Surkov) <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435906">Bug 435906</a> - No overlay support in Chatzilla standalone on XULRunner for DOMi (patch by Colby Russell) <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501178">Bug 501178</a> - style sheets viewer doesn't handle HTMLStyleElements well and incorrectly implements nsITreeView::hasNextSibling (patch by Colby Russell) <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526939">Bug 526939</a> - DOM Inspector hangs trying to find a ID that doesn't exist (patch by Colby Russell) <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530039">Bug 530039</a> - expose accessible action interface in DOMi (patch by Alexander Surkov) <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532024">Bug 532024</a> - update accessible tree when accessible reorder event is occurred (patch by Alexander Surkov) <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532355">Bug 532355</a> - Implement 'Blink selected element' for accessibleTree view (patch by Alexander Surkov) <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536012">Bug 536012</a> - Recent Version of DOM Inspector (2.04) unable to edit CSS properties in CSS Rules view (patch by Colby Russell) <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548139">Bug 548139</a> - Enable double-click to edit in DOM node viewer (patch by Colby Russell) <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=551457">Bug 551457</a> - add some syntax sugar for evaluated code in accessibleTree/evalJSDialog (patch by Alexander Surkov) I also updated the license to be the tri-license like it is. We should probably generate a contributors list and use it in the future, and get the right copywrite date (I guessed 2000).