Open
Bug 580070
(ParisBindings)
Opened 14 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
New JSClass-based DOM bindings
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: gal, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 66 open bugs)
Details
No description provided.
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Summary: experimental DOM bindings for Ins/Del using proxies → New JSClass-based DOM bindings
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: gal → nobody
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
FYI, there are tests that may be useful at
https://www.w3c-test.org/webapps/DOMCore/tests/submissions/AryehGregor/interfaces.html
https://www.w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/AryehGregor/interfaces.html
Blocks: 734636
Depends on: 740069
Updated•13 years ago
|
Depends on: idbwebidl
Depends on: 763367
No longer blocks: xhr
Depends on: 763573
Updated•12 years ago
|
Depends on: CVE-2012-3989
Updated•12 years ago
|
Updated•12 years ago
|
Alias: ParisBindings
No longer blocks: 234628
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Are there any performance comparisons for this work? I'd love to see a blog post informing about the ongoing changes and what this means e. g. for DOM performance (with up-to-date numbers). Though this can wait until the majority of Bugs (esp. for document Obj Bindings) have been fixed.
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
A followup blog post to
http://jstenback.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/history-of-mozillas-dom-bindings/ and
http://jstenback.wordpress.com/2012/04/11/new-dom-bindings/
would be indeed nice.
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
We definitely have performance numbers. See http://dromaeo.com/?id=186075,186085,186086,186076 for example, and more to come as we convert actual DOM nodes and documents and such...
There are also the obvious wins on ImageData performance (bug 746773 comment 14) and whatnot, and on WebGL performance.
Since the bindings are landing piecemeal and the JS engine is improving in parallel, disentangling the two effects can be difficult, though. I can't tell you which one is responsible for the changes in the Dromaeo dom-query numbers above, for example. So do you want to see numbers comparing to Fx13 (before any of this stuff landed) or some other peformance comparison?
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
This is indeed helpful. It would be nice to have kind of a summary after all the ParisBindings work is done.
Comparing Fx 13 with any current version will probably not tell you very much, as we now have a totally new JIT engine (though comparing Fx 13 to any pre-IM version may help, as well as any comparisons between different IM version).
What about having something like AWFY (or actually extend AWFY with Dromaeo)? That may also help with finding regressions.
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
> as we now have a totally new JIT engine
Well. Part of the bindings work was closer integration with the new JIT that's allowed by the new bindings; in fact that's one of the major sources of speedup. So for classes we convert now comparing before/after behavior makes sense, but for classes we converted before fx18 there was a noticeable speedup from Ion landing.
> or actually extend AWFY with Dromaeo
AWFY runs in a JS shell, so does not have DOM access, last I checked. Something like AWFY for DOM stuff would be great, of course. ;)
Depends on: 883741
Depends on: 903770
Depends on: 904303
Depends on: 928312
Depends on: 1257037
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•