[meta] Bugs found during testing and initial release of TB91
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: wsmwk, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 36 open bugs, Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: meta)
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1644037 +++
We use this meta to track bugs found late in beta 91 and early in 91.0[1]. Meaning during formal and informal testing activities immediately prior the release of Thunderbird 91, and also bugs found during the initial release period. You can set bugs found during this time to block this bug, so that developers and users can easily get timely notice of their discovery.
query for new bugs not yet blocking this bug
[1] This meta bug is not intended to capture old existing bugs reported between 78 and 91, nor to gain attention to major unresolved issues, nor as a draft for release notes. Please use NI and tracking flags in the respective bugs to individually move them forward.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
Please note I have clarified comment 0 "We use this meta to track bugs found late in beta 91 and early in 91.0[1]."
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
What is the difference to setting tracking on a bug? Many from this query https://mzl.la/3yoa62U should be added here, for example bug 1716240, bug 1713786, bug 1717908, bug 1722938, etc.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to José M. Muñoz from comment #2)
What is the difference to setting tracking on a bug?
Not every new bug deserves tracking? Anyway, the question of tracking is orthogonal to this bug and rather out of scope. Please reread the bold in comment 0? (Perhaps the confusion lies in the fact that this meta is intended to be a fire hose of the newest bug reports against version 91, and so it isn't a traditional meta bug that groups bugs which have some logical behavioral or functional connection to each other.)
Many from this query https://mzl.la/3yoa62U should be added here, for example bug 1716240, bug 1713786, bug 1717908, bug 1722938, etc.
This meta is primarily for new bug reports going forward, so I suggest "no" to most of them per comment 0, and yes to only the ones created in the past couple days. Instead, maybe add a query here to other bugs people may be interested in?
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 4•3 years ago
|
||
Can we get Bug 376121 on here?
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
Should this bug start wrapping up soon, and close any loose ends? It would be good to put a light at the end of the tunnel.
I'd say the "testing and initial release of TB91" train has left the station.
Reporter | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Description
•